FYI, there's an effort planned for 1.11 to improve the memory configuration of the Flink master process, similar to FLIP-49 but definitely less complexity.
I would not consider the memory configuration improvement as a blocker for this effort. As far as I can see, there's nothing in conflict. Just after the memory configuration improvement, we might be able to present more information on the JM metrics page, which are tightly corresponding to the configuration options, like what we planned for the TM metrics page in FLIP-102. Therefore, it might make sense to proceed this FLIP afterwards. I'm neutral on this, and would leave the call to Yandong and Lining. Thank you~ Xintong Song On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:47 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Yadong, > > I think we can use different color to distinguish the memory usage (from > green to red?). > Besides, I think we should add an unit on the "Garbage Collection" -> > "Time", it's hard to know what the value mean. > Would be better to display the value like "10ms", "5ns". > > Best, > Jark > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 17:58, Yadong Xie <vthink...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > I want to start the vote for FLIP-104, which proposes to add more metrics > > to job manager. > > > > To help everyone better understand the proposal, we spent some efforts on > > making an online POC > > > > previous web: http://101.132.122.69:8081/#/job-manager/config > > POC web: http://101.132.122.69:8081/web/#/job-manager/metrics > > > > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours, following the consensus voting > > process. > > > > FLIP wiki: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-104%3A+Add+More+Metrics+to+Jobmanager > > > > Discussion thread: > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-75-Flink-Web-UI-Improvement-Proposal-td33540.html > > > > Thanks, > > > > Yadong > > >
