+1 non-binding

It is really straightforward.

Best,
Yang

Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月21日周五 下午1:52写道:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 11:51, Kurt Young <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:09 AM Zhijiang <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
> > .invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > > It seems more clearly and directly to highlight the back pressured
> vertex
> > > in topology, which can raise the attention of users.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Zhijiang
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > From:Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com>
> > > Send Time:2020 Feb. 20 (Thu.) 21:49
> > > To:dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > > Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-98: Better Back Pressure Detection
> > >
> > > +1 for this improvement, It's very helpful to know whether a task is
> > > backpressured or not.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Congxian
> > >
> > >
> > > Yadong Xie <vthink...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月20日周四 下午5:34写道:
> > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > I want to start the vote for FLIP-98, which proposes to provide
> better
> > > > backpressure detection experience in web UI.
> > > >
> > > > To help everyone better understand the proposal, we spent some
> efforts
> > on
> > > > making an online POC
> > > >
> > > > previous web:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://101.132.122.69:8081/#/job/add9d3ea1006af15b9f872987eb3befd/overview
> > > > POC web:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://101.132.122.69:8081/web/#/job/add9d3ea1006af15b9f872987eb3befd/overview
> > > >
> > > > The vote will last for at least 72 hours, following the consensus
> > voting
> > > > process.
> > > >
> > > > FLIP wiki:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-98%3A+Better+Back+Pressure+Detection
> > > >
> > > > Discussion thread:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-75-Flink-Web-UI-Improvement-Proposal-td33540.html
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Yadong
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to