+1 for dropping them, this stuff is quite old by now.

On 10.02.20 15:04, Benchao Li wrote:
+1 for dropping 2.x - 5.x.

FYI currently only 6.x and 7.x ES Connectors are supported by table api.

Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> 于2020年2月10日周一 下午10:03写道:

+1 for dropping all Elasticsearch connectors < 6.x

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:45 PM Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org>
wrote:

Hi all,

As described in this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11720
ticket our elasticsearch 5.x connector does not work out of the box on
some systems and requires a version bump. This also happens for our e2e.
We cannot bump the version in es 5.x connector, because 5.x connector
shares a common class with 2.x that uses an API that was replaced in 5.2.

Both versions are already long eol: https://www.elastic.co/support/eol

I suggest to drop both connectors 5.x and 2.x. If it is too much to drop
both of them, I would strongly suggest dropping at least 2.x connector
and update the 5.x line to a working es client module.

What do you think? Should we drop both versions? Drop only the 2.x
connector? Or keep them both?

Best,

Dawid





Reply via email to