Thanks for resuming the discussion Hequn. +1 for starting with the RC
creation. Thanks for driving the release process!

Cheers,
Till

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:02 PM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Cool, looking forward the first RC of release 1.9.2.
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
>
> Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月21日周二 下午10:02写道:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Considering that we are on the finishing line for release-1.10.0 and that
> > there are no blockers for release-1.9.2, I'm proposing to resume this
> > discussion.
> > If there are no more concerns or any critical issues for releasing
> 1.9.2, I
> > would like to create the first RC soon :)
> >
> > Best,
> > Hequn
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 7:10 PM Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Till,
> > >
> > > I agree with your concerns and thanks a lot for your feedback!
> > >
> > > In fact, I also have those concerns. The reasons I started the DISCUSS
> > are:
> > > - Considering the low capacities, I want to start the discussion
> earlier
> > > so that we can have more time to collect information and planning for
> the
> > > release. Usually, it takes a couple of weeks to address the blockers.
> > > - The blockers of 1.9.2 are probably also blockers for 1.10.0, take
> > > FLINK-15266 as an example. I can help to drive to solve the problem so
> > that
> > > 1.10.0 can also benefit from it.
> > >
> > > However, to ease the load, we can vote after Christmas if there are no
> > > more blockers at that time.
> > > There is a chance that the 1.10 blocker resolution has calmed down a
> bit.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Hequn
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 7:05 PM Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Jincheng,
> > >>
> > >> Yes, your help would be very helpful. Thanks a lot!
> > >>
> > >> Best, Hequn
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:52 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Hequn,
> > >>>
> > >>> thanks for starting this discussion. In general I think it is a good
> > idea
> > >>> to release often. Hence, I also believe it is time for another bug
> fix
> > >>> release for 1.9.
> > >>>
> > >>> The thing I'm wondering is whether we are stretching our resources a
> > bit
> > >>> too much if we now start with a 1.9.2 release vote because of the
> > ongoing
> > >>> 1.10 release testing work. My concern is that we don't have the
> > >>> capacities
> > >>> to properly test the 1.9 RC. Additionally, many people will be on
> > >>> Christmas
> > >>> vacations during the next 2 weeks. If this is it not a problem and we
> > >>> have
> > >>> enough resources for a parallel release then we can start it.
> Otherwise
> > >>> I'd
> > >>> say that we wait until the 1.10 blocker resolution has calmed down a
> > bit.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Till
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:47 AM jincheng sun <
> sunjincheng...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Thanks for bring up the discussion Hequn. I would like to give you
> a
> > >>> hand
> > >>> > at the last stage when the RC is finished.(If you need)  :)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Best,
> > >>> > Jincheng
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Best,
> > >>> > Jincheng
> > >>> > @sunjincheng121 <https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月18日周三 下午3:44写道:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi everyone,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > It has already been two months since we released the Flink 1.9.1.
> > >>> > > We already have many important bug fixes from which our users can
> > >>> benefit
> > >>> > > in the release-1.9 branch (85 resolved issues).
> > >>> > > Therefore, I propose to create the next bug fix release for Flink
> > >>> 1.9.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Most notable fixes are:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > - [FLINK-14074] MesosResourceManager can't create new
> taskmanagers
> > in
> > >>> > > Session Cluster Mode.
> > >>> > > - [FLINK-14995] Kinesis NOTICE is incorrect
> > >>> > > - [FLINK-15013] Flink (on YARN) sometimes needs too many slots
> > >>> > > - [FLINK-15036] Container startup error will be handled out side
> of
> > >>> the
> > >>> > > YarnResourceManager's main thread
> > >>> > > - [FLINK-14315] NPE with JobMaster.disconnectTaskManager
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Furthermore, there is one issue marked as blocker for 1.9.2 which
> > >>> should
> > >>> > be
> > >>> > > merged before 1.9.2 release:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > - [FLINK-15266] NPE in blink planner code gen (reviewing)
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > If there are any other blocker issues need to be fixed in 1.9.2,
> > >>> please
> > >>> > let
> > >>> > > me know.
> > >>> > > I will kick off the release process once blocker issues have been
> > >>> merged.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > It would be very appreciated if there is any PMC can help with
> the
> > >>> final
> > >>> > > steps of the release process.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Best,
> > >>> > > Hequn
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to