Hi Jingsong Lee :

Thank you very much, I need to apply for FLIP permission. Do I need to
create a FLIP for this?

Best,
Forward

Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月2日周一 上午11:40写道:

> Hi Forward:
>
> Document looks good to me.
> I think you can just start doing this.
> They all work very independently, so I don't think there's any obvious
> blocking.
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:59 AM Forward Xu <forwardxu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone, It's been a long time since I started this discussion. Do
> you
> > have anything to add and improve?
> > Best,
> > Forward
> >
> > Forward Xu <forwardxu...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月22日周日 下午6:30写道:
> >
> > > Hi Jack,
> > > Thank you very much for your reply, google doc I have updated, and some
> > of
> > > your questions I replied.
> > >  In addition, I want to apply for Flip permissions for this purpose.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Forward
> > >
> > > Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月20日周五 下午9:53写道:
> > >
> > >> Hi Forward,
> > >>
> > >> Sorry for the late reply. I have went through the design doc and I
> think
> > >> it
> > >> is very nice.
> > >>
> > >> Here are my thoughts and suggestions:
> > >>
> > >> 0) I think support JSON functions in SQL is not complicated. Because
> > >> Calcite already supports the parser part and the runtime part.
> > >>     We only need to integrate it in Flink and add good coverage tests.
> > >> 1) However, I think we should also design the corresponding JSON
> > Functions
> > >> API for Table API which is very important.
> > >>     I don't have a clear idea about how to support all the JSON
> Function
> > >> syntax in Table API. And this may need more discussions.
> > >> 2) IMO, it deserves a FLIP (especially for the Table API part). You
> can
> > >> follow the FLIP process [1] to start a FLIP proposal.
> > >> 3) I think we only need to implement it in blink planner as we are
> going
> > >> to
> > >> deprecate old planner.
> > >>    So could you update the implementation section in the doc because
> the
> > >> implementation in blink planner should be different.
> > >> 4) It would be better to have an implementation plan to priority the
> > >> sub-tasks.
> > >>     From my point of view, JSON_VALUE is the most important and
> > JSON_TABLE
> > >> gets the least priority.
> > >>
> > >> I also left some comments in the google doc.
> > >>
> > >> Hi @JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com> ,
> > >>
> > >> I think we don't need to wait for FLIP-51. As we don't have a clear
> > >> progress of FLIP-51.
> > >> And as far as I know, it will add a few of PlannerExpressions which
> can
> > be
> > >> refactored easily during FLIP-51.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Jark
> > >>
> > >> [1]:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 19:29, vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1 to have JSON functions in Flink SQL
> > >> >
> > >> > JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com.invalid> 于2019年9月5日周四
> 下午4:46写道:
> > >> >
> > >> > > +1
> > >> > > Nice document. I think it is easier to do after expression
> > >> reworking[1].
> > >> > > By the way, which planner do you want to start?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [1]
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-51%3A+Rework+of+the+Expression+Design
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best,
> > >> > > Jingsong Lee
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > From:TANG Wen-hui <winifred.wenhui.t...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > Send Time:2019年9月5日(星期四) 14:36
> > >> > > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >> > > Subject:Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Support JSON functions in Flink SQL
> > >> > >
> > >> > > +1
> > >> > > I have done similar work before.
> > >> > > Looking forward to discussing this feature.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best
> > >> > > wenhui
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > winifred.wenhui.t...@gmail.com
> > >> > >
> > >> > > From: Kurt Young
> > >> > > Date: 2019-09-05 14:00
> > >> > > To: dev
> > >> > > CC: Anyang Hu
> > >> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support JSON functions in Flink SQL
> > >> > > +1 to add JSON support to Flink. We also see lots of requirements
> > for
> > >> > JSON
> > >> > > related functions in our internal platform. Since these are
> already
> > >> SQL
> > >> > > standard, I think it's a good time to add them to Flink.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best,
> > >> > > Kurt
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:37 AM Qi Luo <luoqi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > We also see strong demands from our SQL users for JSON/Date
> > related
> > >> > > > functions.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Also +Anyang Hu <huanyang1...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:51 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi Forward,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks for bringing this discussion and preparing the nice
> > design.
> > >> > > > > I think it's nice to have the JSON functions in the next
> > release.
> > >> > > > > We have received some requirements for this feature.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I can help to shepherd this JSON functions effort and will
> leave
> > >> > > comments
> > >> > > > >  in the design doc in the next days.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi Danny,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > The new introduced JSON functions are from SQL:2016, not from
> > >> MySQL.
> > >> > > > > So there no JSON type is needed. According to the SQL:2016,
> the
> > >> > > > > representation of JSON data can be "character string" which is
> > >> also
> > >> > > > > the current implementation in Calcite[1].
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Best,
> > >> > > > > Jark
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > [1]:
> > >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/reference.html#json-functions
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 21:22, Xu Forward <
> forwardxu...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > hi Danny Chan ,Thank you very much for your reply, your help
> > can
> > >> > help
> > >> > > > me
> > >> > > > > > further improve this discussion.
> > >> > > > > > Best
> > >> > > > > > forward
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Danny Chan <yuzhao....@gmail.com> 于2019年9月4日周三 下午8:50写道:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Thanks Xu Forward for bring up this topic, I think the
> JSON
> > >> > > functions
> > >> > > > > are
> > >> > > > > > > very useful especially for those MySQL users.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I saw that you have done some work within the Apache
> > Calcite,
> > >> > > that’s
> > >> > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > good start, but this is one concern from me, Flink doesn’t
> > >> > support
> > >> > > > JSON
> > >> > > > > > > type internal, so how to represent a JSON object in Flink
> > >> maybe a
> > >> > > key
> > >> > > > > > point
> > >> > > > > > > we need to resolve. In Calcite, we use ANY type to
> represent
> > >> as
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > JSON,
> > >> > > > > > > but I don’t think it is the right way to go, maybe we can
> > >> have a
> > >> > > > > > discussion
> > >> > > > > > > here.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Best,
> > >> > > > > > > Danny Chan
> > >> > > > > > > 在 2019年9月4日 +0800 PM8:34,Xu Forward <
> forwardxu...@gmail.com
> > >> >,写道:
> > >> > > > > > > > Hi everybody,
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I'd like to kick off a discussion on Support JSON
> > functions
> > >> in
> > >> > > > Flink
> > >> > > > > > SQL.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > The entire plan is divided into two steps:
> > >> > > > > > > > 1. Implement Support SQL 2016-2017 JSON functions in
> Flink
> > >> > > SQL[1].
> > >> > > > > > > > 2. Implement non-Support SQL 2016-2017 JSON functions in
> > >> Flink
> > >> > > SQL,
> > >> > > > > > such
> > >> > > > > > > as
> > >> > > > > > > > JSON_TYPE in Mysql, JSON_LENGTH, etc. Very useful JSON
> > >> > functions.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Would love to hear your thoughts.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > [1]
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JfaFYIFOAY8P2pFhOYNCQ9RTzwF4l85_bnTvImOLKMk/edit#heading=h.76mb88ca6yjp
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Best,
> > >> > > > > > > > ForwardXu
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best, Jingsong Lee
>

Reply via email to