+1 (non-binding) Best, Vino
Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> 于2019年10月22日周二 下午4:33写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Zhu Zhu > > Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> 于2019年10月22日周二 上午11:06写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/ > > > > > > > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Jark > > > > > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Best, Hequn > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Dian > > > > > > > > > > > 在 2019年10月22日，上午9:10，Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske < > fhue...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise < > > > > t...@apache.org > > > > > >: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> +1 (binding) > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther < > twal...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> +1 (binding) > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>> Timo > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > > > >>>>> +1 (binding) > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>> Till > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger < > > > > rmetz...@apache.org > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> +1 (binding) > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen < > > se...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful > > > > Functions > > > > > >>> code > > > > > >>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and > > website > > > > can > > > > > >>> be > > > > > >>>>>>> found here: > > > > > >>>>>>> https://statefun.io/ > > > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community > > is > > > > > >>>> interested > > > > > >>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this > > project > > > > is > > > > > >> a > > > > > >>>>>> great > > > > > >>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the > > > > > >> community > > > > > >>>>>> into a > > > > > >>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in > such > > > use > > > > > >>>> cases, > > > > > >>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently > is. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this > > > > > >> integrates > > > > > >>>>>> well > > > > > >>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to > > > > maintain > > > > > >>>> this > > > > > >>>>>>> new component well. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the > Flink > > > > bylaws > > > > > >>>> [1]. > > > > > >>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least > 6 > > > days > > > > > >>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 > > UTC, > > > > or > > > > > >>>> until > > > > > >>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Happy voting! > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>> Stephan > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
