+1 (binding)
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Timo > > > On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code > >>> contribution to Apache Flink. > >>> > >>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be > >>> found here: > >>> https://statefun.io/ > >>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions > >>> > >>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is > interested > >>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions. > >>> > >>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a > >> great > >>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community > >> into a > >>> new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use > cases, > >>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is. > >>> > >>> I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates > >> well > >>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain > this > >>> new component well. > >>> > >>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws > [1]. > >>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days > >>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or > until > >> we > >>> achieve the 2/3rd majority. > >>> > >>> Happy voting! > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Stephan > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026 > > >
