Thanks all for the voting. I'm closing the vote now. So far, the vote received:
* +1 votes (4 binding, 2 non-binding): - Kurt Young (binding) - Danny Chan - Jingsong Lee - Rong Rong (binding) - Timo (binding) - Jark (binding) * 0/-1 votes: none Thereby, the community accepted FLIP-66. I'll update the FLIP wiki page accordingly and create JIRA issues. Hi Timo, I agree the per-partition watermarks is an important feature that many users require, let's discuss it in computed column FLIP. This is also very relevant to the design of computed column. Cheers, Jark On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 11:02, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from my side. > > Best, > Jark > > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 09:33, Rong Rong <walter...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oops.. Sorry for the confusion. I thought only PMC votes are binding. >> Thanks for the clarification @Timo :-D >> >> -- >> Rong >> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:12 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > +1 for the syntax and their semantics >> > >> > I think the implementation part is still a bit unclear to me because it >> > only ensures the current status but still does not solve future >> > requirements such as per-partition watermarks that need to be pushed >> > into a connector such as Kafka. We can also discuss that as part of the >> > computed column FLIP. >> > >> > @Rong: Why do you think you vote is not binding? Committer votes are >> > binding :-) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Timo >> > >> > On 29.09.19 02:17, Rong Rong wrote: >> > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions >> @Jark >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Rong >> > > >> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com >> > .invalid> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> +1 non-binding >> > >> (nit: Add a road map?) >> > >> >> > >> Best, >> > >> Jingsong Lee >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> From:Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> >> > >> Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44 >> > >> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> >> > >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2) >> > >> >> > >> +1 >> > >> >> > >> Best, >> > >> Kurt >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi all, >> > >>> >> > >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed >> and >> > >>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2]. >> > >>> >> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it >> after >> > >>> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. >> > >>> >> > >>> Thanks, >> > >>> Jark >> > >>> >> > >>> [1]: >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL >> > >>> [2]: >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html >> > >> > >> > >> >
