1 more question .. since it has been cherry picked to 1.9 branch will the
maven artifacts of 1.9 also be updated accordingly ?

regards.

On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 1:37 PM Debasish Ghosh <ghosh.debas...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks a lot ..
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 1:36 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Debasish,
>>
>> +1 have FLINK-12501 in 1.9.1. As there is nobody against it under the
>> JIRA issue. I just cherry-picked it to 1.9 branch.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jark
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 13:09, Debasish Ghosh <ghosh.debas...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> Will FLINK-12501 be included in 1.9.1 ?
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 9:04 AM, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I am here to update the progress of the issues that need to be tracked:
>>> >
>>> > - FLINK-14010 (merged)
>>> > - FLINK-13386 (merged)
>>> > - FLINK-14145 (merged)
>>> > - FLINK-14118 (not back port to 1.9)
>>> > - FLINK-13708 (as discussed with Jeff offline, postpone it to 1.9.2)
>>> >
>>> > Great thanks to all of you for helping fix and reviewing!  All the
>>> blocker
>>> > issues for 1.9.1 has been resolved.
>>> > Thanks @Jincheng for creating 1.9.2 version in JIRA.
>>> > I'll proceed to create the first release candidate for 1.9.1 now then.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Jark
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 18:25, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Thanks a lot for the kindly help @jincheng. That will be really
>>> helpful.
>>> > > Could you help to create 1.9.2 release version in JIRA when you are
>>> free?
>>> > >
>>> > > Best,
>>> > > Jark
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 17:59, jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Good Job Jark, Looking forward the first RC of 1.9.1. And I would
>>> like
>>> > to
>>> > >> give you a hand at the last stage when the RC is finished.(If you
>>> need)
>>> > >> Best,
>>> > >> Jincheng
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月25日周三 下午8:04写道:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > Hi all,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > I am here to update the progress of the issue that needs to be
>>> > tracked:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > - FLINK-14010 (merged)
>>> > >> > - FLINK-14118 (under discussion whether we should back port it to
>>> 1.9)
>>> > >> > - FLINK-13386 (Daryl reviewed and Dawid will verify the
>>> functionality
>>> > >> > again)
>>> > >> > - FLINK-13708 (under reviewing)
>>> > >> > - FLINK-14145 (merged to master and need to merge it to 1.9 if we
>>> all
>>> > >> > agree)
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Great thanks to all of you for helping fix and reviewing!
>>> > >> > Ideally, we can kick off the release vote for the first RC early
>>> next
>>> > >> week.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Best,
>>> > >> > Jark
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 01:25, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org
>>> >
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > FLINK-14010 has been merged.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > Cheers,
>>> > >> > > Till
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:14 AM Gyula Fóra <
>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > +1 for 1.9.1 soon :)
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > I would also like to include a fix to:
>>> > >> > > > FLINK-14145 - getLatestCheckpoint(true) returns wrong
>>> checkpoint
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > It is already merged to master and just need to merge it to
>>> 1.9 if
>>> > >> we
>>> > >> > all
>>> > >> > > > agree (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9756)
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > Cheers,
>>> > >> > > > Gyula
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:23 AM Terry Wang <
>>> zjuwa...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > > +1 for the 1.9.1 release and for Jark being the RM.
>>> > >> > > > > Thanks Jark for driving on this.
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > Best,
>>> > >> > > > > Terry Wang
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > 在 2019年9月24日,下午2:19,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Thanks Till for reviewing FLINK-14010.
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Hi Jeff, I think it makes sense to merge FLINK-13708
>>> before
>>> > the
>>> > >> > > release
>>> > >> > > > > (PR
>>> > >> > > > > > has been reviewed).
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Hi Debasish, FLINK-12501 has already been merged in
>>> 1.10.0.
>>> > I'm
>>> > >> > fine
>>> > >> > > to
>>> > >> > > > > > cherry-pick it to 1.9 if we
>>> > >> > > > > > have a consensus this issue could be viewed as a bug. We
>>> can
>>> > >> > continue
>>> > >> > > > the
>>> > >> > > > > > discussion in the JIRA.
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Best,
>>> > >> > > > > > Jark
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 13:39, Dian Fu <
>>> dian0511...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > >> +1 for 1.9.1 release and Jark being the RM. Thanks Jark
>>> for
>>> > >> > kicking
>>> > >> > > > off
>>> > >> > > > > >> this release and the volunteering.
>>> > >> > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > >> Regards,
>>> > >> > > > > >> Dian
>>> > >> > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > >>> 在 2019年9月24日,上午10:45,Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>> > >> > > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>> +1 for the 1.9.1 release and for Jark being the RM.
>>> > >> > > > > >>> Thanks Jark for the volunteering.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>> Best,
>>> > >> > > > > >>> Kurt
>>> > >> > > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:17 PM Till Rohrmann <
>>> > >> > > trohrm...@apache.org>
>>> > >> > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > >>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> +1 for the 1.9.1 release and for Jark being the RM.
>>> I'll
>>> > help
>>> > >> > with
>>> > >> > > > the
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> review of FLINK-14010.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> Cheers,
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> Till
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:32 AM Debasish Ghosh <
>>> > >> > > > > >> ghosh.debas...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> I hope
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12501
>>> > >> will
>>> > >> > > also
>>> > >> > > > > be
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> part
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> of 1.9.1 ..
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> regards.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:39 AM Jeff Zhang <
>>> > >> zjf...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> FLINK-13708 is also very critical IMO. This would
>>> cause
>>> > >> > invalid
>>> > >> > > > > flink
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> job
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> (doubled output)
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月23日周一 下午2:03写道:
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> It has already been a month since we released Flink
>>> > 1.9.0.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> We already have many important bug fixes from which
>>> our
>>> > >> users
>>> > >> > > can
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> benefit
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> in the release-1.9 branch (83 resolved issues).
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> Therefore, I propose to create the next bug fix
>>> release
>>> > >> for
>>> > >> > > Flink
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> 1.9.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> Most notable fixes are:
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13526] When switching to a non existing
>>> catalog
>>> > >> or
>>> > >> > > > > database
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> in
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> the
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> SQL Client the client crashes.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13568] It is not possible to create a table
>>> > with
>>> > >> a
>>> > >> > > > > "STRING"
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> data
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> type via the SQL DDL.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13941] Prevent data-loss by not cleaning up
>>> > small
>>> > >> > part
>>> > >> > > > > files
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> from
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> S3.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13490][jdbc] If one column value is null
>>> when
>>> > >> > reading
>>> > >> > > > > JDBC,
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> the
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> following values will all be null.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-14107][kinesis] When using event time
>>> alignment
>>> > >> with
>>> > >> > > the
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> Kinsesis
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> Consumer the consumer might deadlock in one corner
>>> case.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> Furthermore, I would like the following critical
>>> issues
>>> > >> to be
>>> > >> > > > > merged
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> before
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> 1.9.1 release:
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-14118] Reduce the unnecessary flushing when
>>> > >> there is
>>> > >> > > no
>>> > >> > > > > data
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> available for flush which can save 20% ~ 40% CPU.
>>> > >> (reviewing)
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13386] Fix A couple of issues with the new
>>> > >> dashboard
>>> > >> > > > have
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> already
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> been filed. (PR is created, need review)
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-14010][yarn] The Flink YARN cluster can get
>>> > into
>>> > >> an
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> inconsistent
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> state in some cases, where
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> leaderhship for JobManager, ResourceManager and
>>> > Dispatcher
>>> > >> > > > > components
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> is
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> split between two master processes. (PR is created,
>>> need
>>> > >> > > review)
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> I would volunteer as release manager and kick off
>>> the
>>> > >> release
>>> > >> > > > > process
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> once
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> blocker issues has been merged. What do you think?
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> If there is any other blocker issues need to be
>>> fixed in
>>> > >> > 1.9.1,
>>> > >> > > > > >>>> please
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> let
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> me know.
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> Cheers,
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>> Jark
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> --
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> Best Regards
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> Jeff Zhang
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> --
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> Debasish Ghosh
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> http://manning.com/ghosh2
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> http://manning.com/ghosh
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> Twttr: @debasishg
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> Blog: http://debasishg.blogspot.com
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>> Code: http://github.com/debasishg
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > > >>
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> --
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Debasish Ghosh
> http://manning.com/ghosh2
> http://manning.com/ghosh
>
> Twttr: @debasishg
> Blog: http://debasishg.blogspot.com
> Code: http://github.com/debasishg
>


-- 
Debasish Ghosh
http://manning.com/ghosh2
http://manning.com/ghosh

Twttr: @debasishg
Blog: http://debasishg.blogspot.com
Code: http://github.com/debasishg

Reply via email to