Thanks for you review, I will send a another vote thread from my apache email.
Best, Jingsong Lee ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com> Send Time:2019年9月24日(星期二) 03:06 To:JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com.invalid> Cc:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-63: Rework table partition support Hi Jingsong, Thanks for driving this effort! Besides a few further comments on Catalog APIs that I just left, it LGTM. Not sure why, but the voting thread in gmail shows in the same thread as the discussion's. After addressing all the comments, could you start a new, separate thread to let other people be aware of it? Thanks, Bowen On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:25 AM JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com.invalid> wrote: > Thanks for your discussion on google document. > Comments addressed and added FileSystem connector chapter, and introduce > code prototype for file system connector to unify flink file system and > hive connectors. > > Looking forward to your feedbacks. Thank you. > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com> > Send Time:2019年9月18日(星期三) 09:45 > To:Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com>; dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-63: Rework table partition support > > Thanks for your reply and google doc comments. It has been discussed > for two weeks now. I will start a vote thread. > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> > Send Time:2019年9月16日(星期一) 15:55 > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Cc:JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com> > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-63: Rework table partition support > > +1 to this feature, I left some comments on google doc. > > Another comment is I think we should do some reorganize about the content > when you converting this to a cwiki page. I will have some offline > discussion > with you. > > Since this feature seems to be a fairly big efforts, so I suggest we can > settle > down the design doc ASAP and start vote process. > Best, > Kurt > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:43 PM Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jingsong, > > Thanks for explaining. It looks cool! > > Thanks, > Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/ > > > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 11:37, JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com > .invalid> > wrote: > > > Hi biao, thanks for your feedbacks: > > > > Actually, the runtime source partition of runtime is similar to split, > > which concerns data reading, parallelism and fault tolerance, all the > > runtime concepts. > > While table partition is only a virtual concept. Users are more likely > to > > choose which partition to read and which partition to write. Users can > > manage their partitions. > > One is physical implementation correlation, the other is logical concept > > correlation. > > So I think they are two completely different things. > > > > About [2], The main problem is that how to write data to a catalog file > > system in stream mode, it is a general problem and has little to do with > > partition. > > > > [2] > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Support-notifyOnMaster-for-notifyCheckpointComplete-td32769.html > > > > Best, > > Jingsong Lee > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From:Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> > > Send Time:2019年9月10日(星期二) 14:57 > > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>; JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com> > > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-63: Rework table partition support > > > > Hi Jingsong, > > > > Thank you for bringing this discussion. Since I don't have much > experience > > of Flink table/SQL, I'll ask some questions from runtime or engine > > perspective. > > > > > ... where we describe how to partition support in flink and how to > > integrate to hive partition. > > > > FLIP-27 [1] introduces "partition" concept officially. The changes of > > FLIP-27 are not only about source interface but also about the whole > > infrastructure. > > Have you ever thought how to integrate your proposal with these changes? > > Or you just want to support "partition" in table layer, there will be no > > requirement of underlying infrastructure? > > > > I have seen a discussion [2] that seems be a requirement of > infrastructure > > to support your proposal. So I have some concerns there might be some > > conflicts between this proposal and FLIP-27. > > > > 1. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-27%3A+Refactor+Source+Interface > > 2. > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Support-notifyOnMaster-for-notifyCheckpointComplete-td32769.html > > > > Thanks, > > Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/ > > > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 13:22, JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com > .invalid> > > wrote: > > Hi everyone, thank you for your comments. Mail name was updated > > and streaming-related concepts were added. > > > > We would like to start a discussion thread on "FLIP-63: Rework table > > partition support"(Design doc: [1]), where we describe how to partition > > support in flink and how to integrate to hive partition. > > > > This FLIP addresses: > > - Introduce whole story about partition support. > > - Introduce and discuss DDL of partition support. > > - Introduce static and dynamic partition insert. > > - Introduce partition pruning > > - Introduce dynamic partition implementation > > - Introduce FileFormatSink to deal with streaming exactly-once and > > partition-related logic. > > > > Details can be seen in the design document. > > Looking forward to your feedbacks. Thank you. > > > > [1] > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/15R3vZ1R_pAHcvJkRx_CWleXgl08WL3k_ZpnWSdzP7GY/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Best, > > Jingsong Lee > > > > > >
