Agree with Dawid's suggestion about function. Having a Functions section to unify the built-in function and UDF would be better.
Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> 于2019年8月30日周五 下午7:43写道： > +1 to the idea of restructuring the docs. > > My only suggestion to consider is how about moving the > User-Defined-Extensions subpages to corresponding broader topics? > > Sources & Sinks >> Connect to external systems > > Catalogs >> Connect to external systems > > and then have a Functions sections with subsections: > > functions > > |- built in functions > > |- user defined functions > > > Best, > > Dawid > > On 30/08/2019 10:59, Timo Walther wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > the Table API & SQL documentation was already in a very good shape in > > Flink 1.8. However, in the past it was mostly presented as an addition > > to DataStream API. As the Table and SQL world is growing quickly, > > stabilizes in its concepts, and is considered as another top-level API > > and closed ecosystem, it is time to restructure the docs a little bit > > to represent the vision of FLIP-32. > > > > Current state: > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/dev/table/ > > > > We would like to propose the following FLIP-60 for a new structure: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=127405685 > > > > > > Looking forward to feedback. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Timo > > > > > > > >
