@Chesnay No. Users will have to manually build and install PyFlink themselves in 1.9.0: https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.9/flinkDev/building.html#build-pyflink
This is also mentioned in the announcement blog post (to-be-merged): https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/244/files#diff-0cc840a590f5cab2485934278134c9baR291 On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:03 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote: > Are we also releasing python artifacts for 1.9? > > On 21/08/2019 19:23, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this candidate as > > the 1.9.0 release. > > > > There are 12 approving votes, 5 of which are binding: > > - Yu Li > > - Zili Chen > > - Gordon Tai > > - Stephan Ewen > > - Jark Wu > > - Vino Yang > > - Gary Yao > > - Bowen Li > > - Chesnay Schepler > > - Till Rohrmann > > - Aljoscha Krettek > > - David Anderson > > > > There are no disapproving votes. > > > > Thanks everyone who has contributed to this release! > > > > I will wait until tomorrow morning for the artifacts to be available in > > Maven central before announcing the release in a separate thread. > > > > The release blog post will also be merged tomorrow along with the > official > > announcement. > > > > Cheers, > > Gordon > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019, 5:37 PM David Anderson <da...@ververica.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> I upgraded the flink-training-exercises project. > >> > >> I encountered a few rough edges, including problems in the docs, but > >> nothing serious. > >> > >> I had to make some modifications to deal with changes in the Table API: > >> > >> ExternalCatalogTable.builder became new ExternalCatalogTableBuilder > >> TableEnvironment.getTableEnvironment became > StreamTableEnvironment.create > >> StreamTableDescriptorValidator.UPDATE_MODE() became > >> StreamTableDescriptorValidator.UPDATE_MODE > >> org.apache.flink.table.api.java.Slide moved to > >> org.apache.flink.table.api.Slide > >> > >> I also found myself forced to change a CoProcessFunction to a > >> KeyedCoProcessFunction (which it should have been). > >> > >> I also tried a few complex queries in the SQL console, and wrote a > >> simple job using the State Processor API. Everything worked. > >> > >> David > >> > >> > >> David Anderson | Training Coordinator > >> > >> Follow us @VervericaData > >> > >> -- > >> Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference > >> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:45 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> I checked the last RC on a GCE cluster and was satisfied with the > >> testing. The cherry-picked commits didn’t change anything related, so > I’m > >> forwarding my vote from there. > >>> Aljoscha > >>> > >>>> On 21. Aug 2019, at 13:34, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>> +1 (binding) > >>>> > >>>> On 21/08/2019 08:09, Bowen Li wrote: > >>>>> +1 non-binding > >>>>> > >>>>> - built from source with default profile > >>>>> - manually ran SQL and Table API tests for Flink's metadata > >> integration > >>>>> with Hive Metastore in local cluster > >>>>> - manually ran SQL tests for batch capability with Blink planner and > >> Hive > >>>>> integration (source/sink/udf) in local cluster > >>>>> - file formats include: csv, orc, parquet > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:23 PM Gary Yao <g...@ververica.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Reran Jepsen tests 10 times. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 5:35 AM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - checkout source code and build successfully > >>>>>>> - started a local cluster and ran some example jobs successfully > >>>>>>> - verified signatures and hashes > >>>>>>> - checked release notes and post > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Vino > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年8月21日周三 上午4:20写道： > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> - Downloaded the binary release tarball > >>>>>>>> - started a standalone cluster with four nodes > >>>>>>>> - ran some examples through the Web UI > >>>>>>>> - checked the logs > >>>>>>>> - created a project from the Java quickstarts maven archetype > >>>>>>>> - ran a multi-stage DataSet job in batch mode > >>>>>>>> - killed as TaskManager and verified correct restart behavior, > >>>>>> including > >>>>>>>> failover region backtracking > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I found a few issues, and a common theme here is confusing error > >>>>>>> reporting > >>>>>>>> and logging. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (1) When testing batch failover and killing a TaskManager, the job > >>>>>>> reports > >>>>>>>> as the failure cause "org.apache.flink.util.FlinkException: The > >>>>>> assigned > >>>>>>>> slot 6d0e469d55a2630871f43ad0f89c786c_0 was removed." > >>>>>>>> I think that is a pretty bad error message, as a user I don't > >> know > >>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>> that means. Some internal book keeping thing? > >>>>>>>> You need to know a lot about Flink to understand that this > >> means > >>>>>>>> "TaskManager failure". > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13805 > >>>>>>>> I would not block the release on this, but think this should > >> get > >>>>>>> pretty > >>>>>>>> urgent attention. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (2) The Metric Fetcher floods the log with error messages when a > >>>>>>>> TaskManager is lost. > >>>>>>>> There are many exceptions being logged by the Metrics > Fetcher > >> due > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> not reaching the TM any more. > >>>>>>>> This pollutes the log and drowns out the original exception > >> and > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> meaningful logs from the scheduler/execution graph. > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13806 > >>>>>>>> Again, I would not block the release on this, but think this > >>>>>> should > >>>>>>>> get pretty urgent attention. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (3) If you put "web.submit.enable: false" into the configuration, > >> the > >>>>>> web > >>>>>>>> UI will still display the "SubmitJob" page, but errors will > >>>>>>>> continuously pop up, stating "Unable to load requested file > >> /jars." > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13799 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (4) REST endpoint logs ERROR level messages when selecting the > >>>>>>>> "Checkpoints" tab for batch jobs. That does not seem correct. > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13795 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Stephan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:32 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > >>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Legal checks: > >>>>>>>>> - verified signatures and hashes > >>>>>>>>> - New bundled Javascript dependencies for flink-runtime-web are > >>>>>>> correctly > >>>>>>>>> reflected under licenses-binary and NOTICE file. > >>>>>>>>> - locally built from source (Scala 2.12, without Hadoop) > >>>>>>>>> - No missing artifacts in staging repo > >>>>>>>>> - No binaries in source release > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Functional checks: > >>>>>>>>> - Quickstart working (both in IDE + job submission) > >>>>>>>>> - Simple State Processor API program that performs offline key > >> schema > >>>>>>>>> migration (RocksDB backend). Generated savepoint is valid to > >> restore > >>>>>>>> from. > >>>>>>>>> - All E2E tests pass locally > >>>>>>>>> - Didn’t notice any issues with the new WebUI > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Gordon > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:53 AM Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> - build from source: OK(8u212) > >>>>>>>>>> - check local setup tutorial works as expected > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>> tison. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月20日周二 上午8:24写道： > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> - checked release notes: OK > >>>>>>>>>>> - checked sums and signatures: OK > >>>>>>>>>>> - repository appears to contain all expected artifacts > >>>>>>>>>>> - source release > >>>>>>>>>>> - contains no binaries: OK > >>>>>>>>>>> - contains no 1.9-SNAPSHOT references: OK > >>>>>>>>>>> - build from source: OK (8u102) > >>>>>>>>>>> - binary release > >>>>>>>>>>> - no examples appear to be missing > >>>>>>>>>>> - started a cluster; WebUI reachable, example ran > >>>>>> successfully > >>>>>>>>>>> - checked README.md file and found nothing unexpected > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> Yu > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 01:16, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > >>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidate #3 for Apache Flink 1.9.0 is now ready for > >>>>>> your > >>>>>>>>>> review. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #3 for version > >>>>>> 1.9.0, > >>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific > >>>>>>>> comments) > >>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which > >>>>>>>>> includes: > >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > >>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience > >>>>>>>> releases > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the > key > >>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [3], > >>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository > >>>>>>> [4], > >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag “release-1.9.0-rc3” [5]. > >>>>>>>>>>>> * pull requests for the release note documentation [6] and > >>>>>>>>> announcement > >>>>>>>>>>>> blog post [7]. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As proposed in the RC2 vote thread [8], for RC3 we are only > >>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picking > >>>>>>>>>>>> minimal specific changes on top of RC2 to be able to > reasonably > >>>>>>>> carry > >>>>>>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>>>>>> previous testing efforts and effectively require a shorter > >>>>>> voting > >>>>>>>>> time. > >>>>>>>>>>>> The only extra commits in this RC, compared to RC2, are the > >>>>>>>>> following: > >>>>>>>>>>>> - c2d9aeac [FLINK-13231] [pubsub] Replace Max outstanding > >>>>>>>>>> acknowledgement > >>>>>>>>>>>> ids limit with a FlinkConnectorRateLimiter > >>>>>>>>>>>> - d8941711 [FLINK-13699][table-api] Fix TableFactory doesn’t > >>>>>> work > >>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>> DDL > >>>>>>>>>>>> when containing TIMESTAMP/DATE/TIME types > >>>>>>>>>>>> - 04e95278 [FLINK-13752] Only references necessary variables > >>>>>> when > >>>>>>>>>>>> bookkeeping result partitions on TM > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the minimal set of changes, the vote for RC3 will be > >>>>>> *open > >>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>> only > >>>>>>>>>>>> 48 hours*. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. 21st (Wed.) 2019, 17:00 PM > >>>>>>>> CET*. > >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC > >>>>>>> affirmative > >>>>>>>>>>> votes. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc3/ > >>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > >>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1236 > >>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc3 > >>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > >>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/244 > >>>>>>>>>>>> [8] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Flink-Release-1-9-0-release-candidate-2-tp31542p31933.html > >>>> > >
