Hi Biao,

Thanks for working on FLINK-9900. The ticket is already assigned to you now.

Cheers,
Gordon

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:31 PM Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gordon,
>
> Thanks for updating progress.
>
> Currently I'm working on FLINK-9900. I need a committer to assign the
> ticket to me.
>
> Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>于2019年7月30日 周二13:01写道:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There are quite a few instabilities in our builds right now (master +
> > release-1.9), some of which are directed or suspiciously related to the
> 1.9
> > release.
> >
> > I'll categorize the instabilities into ones which we were already
> tracking
> > in the 1.9 Burndown Kanban board [1] prior to this email, and which ones
> > seems to be new or were not monitored so that we draw additional
> attention
> > to them:
> >
> > *Instabilities that were already being tracked*
> >
> > - FLINK-13242: StandaloneResourceManagerTest.testStartupPeriod fails on
> > Travis [2]
> > A fix for this is coming with FLINK-13408 (Schedule
> > StandaloneResourceManager.setFailUnfulfillableRequest whenever the
> > leadership is acquired) [3]
> >
> > *New discovered instabilities that we should also start monitoring*
> >
> > - FLINK-13484: ConnectedComponents E2E fails with
> > ResourceNotAvailableException [4]
> > - FLINK-13487:
> > TaskExecutorPartitionLifecycleTest.testPartitionReleaseAfterReleaseCall
> > failed on Travis [5]. FLINK-13476 (Partitions not being properly released
> > on cancel) could be the cause [6].
> > - FLINK-13488: flink-python fails to build on Travis due to Python 3.3
> > install failure [7]
> > - FLINK-13489: Heavy deployment E2E fails quite consistently on Travis
> with
> > TM heartbeat timeout [8]
> > - FLINK-9900:
> >
> ZooKeeperHighAvailabilityITCase.testRestoreBehaviourWithFaultyStateHandles
> > deadlocks [9]
> > - FLINK-13377: Streaming SQ E2E fails on Travis with mismatching outputs
> > (could just be that the SQL query tested on Travis is indeterministic)
> [10]
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gordon
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?projectKey=FLINK&rapidView=328
> >
> > [2]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13242
> > [3]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13408
> > [4]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13484
> > [5]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13487
> > [6]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13476
> > [7]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13488
> > [8]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13489
> > [9]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9900
> > [10] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13377
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 6:14 AM zhijiang <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
> > .invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Gordon,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the following updates of current progress.
> > > In addition, it might be better to also cover the fix of network
> resource
> > > leak in jira ticket [1] which would be merged soon I think.
> > >
> > > [1] FLINK-13245: This fixes the leak of releasing reader/view with
> > > partition in network stack.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Zhijiang
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > From:Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
> > > Send Time:2019年7月27日(星期六) 10:41
> > > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > > Subject:Re: [ANNOUNCE] Progress updates for Apache Flink 1.9.0 release
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > It's been a while since our last update for the release testing of
> 1.9.0,
> > > so I want to bring attention to the current status of the release.
> > >
> > > We are approaching RC1 soon, waiting on the following specific last
> > ongoing
> > > threads to be closed:
> > > - FLINK-13241: This fixes a problem where when using YARN, slot
> > allocation
> > > requests may be ignored [1]
> > > - FLINK-13371: Potential partitions resource leak in case of producer
> > > restarts [2]
> > > - FLINK-13350: Distinguish between temporary tables and persisted
> tables
> > > [3]. Strictly speaking this would be a new feature, but there was a
> > > discussion here [4] to include a workaround for now in 1.9.0, and a
> > proper
> > > solution later on in 1.10.x.
> > > - FLINK-12858: Potential distributed deadlock in case of synchronous
> > > savepoint failure [5]
> > >
> > > The above is the critical path for moving forward with an RC1 for
> > official
> > > voting.
> > > All of them have PRs already, and are currently being reviewed or close
> > to
> > > being merged.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gordon
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13241
> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13371
> > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13350
> > > [4]
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Support-temporary-tables-in-SQL-API-td30831.html
> > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12858
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:26 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> tzuli...@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Update: RC0 for 1.9.0 has been created. Please see [1] for the
> preview
> > > > source / binary releases and Maven artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Gordon
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/PREVIEW-Apache-Flink-1-9-0-release-candidate-0-td30583.html
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 6:39 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > tzuli...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Flink devs,
> > > >>
> > > >> As previously announced by Kurt [1], the release branch for 1.9.0
> has
> > > >> been cut [2] and we've now started the testing phase for this
> release,
> > > as
> > > >> well as resolving remaining blockers.
> > > >>
> > > >> I want to quickly provide an overview of our progress here.
> > > >> Also, over the course of the testing phase, we will update this mail
> > > >> thread every 2-3 days with the overall progress of the release to
> keep
> > > you
> > > >> updated.
> > > >>
> > > >> *1. Remaining blockers and critical issues*
> > > >> You can find a link here [3] for a release Kanban board that
> provides
> > an
> > > >> overview of the remaining blockers and critical issues for releasing
> > > 1.9.0.
> > > >> The issues listed there are high priority for the release, so any
> help
> > > >> with reviewing or fixing them is highly appreciated!
> > > >> If you do assign yourself to any unassigned issue and start working
> on
> > > >> it, please make sure to pull it to the "In Progress" column to let
> > > others
> > > >> be aware of this.
> > > >>
> > > >> *2. Creating RC 0 for 1.9.0*
> > > >> We will create RC0 now to drive forward the testing efforts.
> > > >> This should be ready by tomorrow morning (July 16, 8am CET).
> > > >> Note that we will not have an official vote for RC0, as this is
> mainly
> > > to
> > > >> drive testing efforts.
> > > >> RC1 with an official vote will be created once the blockers listed
> in
> > > [3]
> > > >> are resolved.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Gordon
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Flink-1-9-release-branch-has-been-created-td30500.html
> > > >> [2]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.9
> > > >> [3]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?projectKey=FLINK&rapidView=328
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to