Thanks for the votes! We have 2 +1's from Congxian and Aljoscha. Since there are no disapproving votes and the voting time has passed, I will see this FLIP as approved to be adopted into Apache Flink.
@Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> Yes, some interface naming in the doc should also be correspondingly updated. Cheers, Gordon On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:14 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > With the restriction that it should be “canonical format”/“unified format” > (or something like it) and not save point format, i.e. not > KeyedBackendSavepointStrategyBase in the doc, for example > > Aljoscha > > > On 17. Jun 2019, at 14:05, Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 from my side. > > Best, > > Congxian > > > > > > Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> 于2019年6月17日周一 上午10:20写道： > > > >> Hi Flink devs, > >> > >> I want to officially start a voting thread to formally adopt FLIP-41 > [1]. > >> > >> There are two relevant discussions threads for this feature [2] [3]. > >> > >> The voting time will end on June 19th 17:00 CET. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Gordon > >> > >> [1] > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-41:+Unify+Keyed+State+Snapshot+Binary+Format+for+Savepoints > >> > >> [2] > >> > >> > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-41-Unify-Keyed-State-Snapshot-Binary-Format-for-Savepoints-td29197.html > >> > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12619 > >> > >
