Hi,

I think this proposed change is big enough to warrant a FLIP [1], which should 
have a voting process as described in that link before the FLIP is accepted. 
I’m writing this because such a bigger change has the possibility of 
languishing for a long time due to lack of PMC/committer bandwidth. A vote 
indicates interest by the PMC/committers to put work into this effort. I 
mentioned earlier that a lot of PMCs/committers are currently busy with other 
efforts around the new Table API Runner story.

I think there is not yet consensus on whether this is the right approach or 
whether keeping a local cache and flushing on receiving the checkpoint barrier 
are better for different approaches. I for one did not yet have time to think 
through the implications of adding such API.

That being said, I don’t think this is a bad proposal, just that I don’t know 
yet, and others might not know as well.

Best,
Aljoscha

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals 
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals>

> On 10. Jun 2019, at 04:30, vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Thanks for all the feedback and comments.
> 
> Since the thread of this feature has been presented about one week in the dev 
> mailing list and has got much support from the community, I have created a 
> new JIRA feature issue[1] to track it and I will split subtasks soon.
> 
> We can move further discussion under related issues. 
> 
> The suggestions and opinions are still welcome and appreciated.
> 
> Best,
> Vino
> 
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12786 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12786>
> mayo zhang <18124766...@163.com <mailto:18124766...@163.com>> 于2019年6月7日周五 
> 下午5:25写道:
>  + 1 for  this feature which is great helpful in product situations and look 
> forward to see it as soon as possible.
> 
> > 在 2019年6月6日,下午4:58,qianjin Xu <forwardxu...@gmail.com 
> > <mailto:forwardxu...@gmail.com>> 写道:
> > 
> >> 
> >> hi
> > 
> > +1 nice work
> > 
> > best
> > 
> > forwardxu
> 
> 

Reply via email to