Hi Shaoxuan/Weihua,

Thanks for the proposal and driving the effort.
I also replied to the original discussion thread, and still a +1 on moving
towards the ski-learn model.
I just left a few comments on the API details and some general questions.
Please kindly take a look.

There's another thread regarding a close to merge FLIP-23 implementation
[1]. I agree this might still be early stage to talk about productionizing
and model-serving. But I would be nice to keep the design/implementation in
mind that: ease of use for productionizing a ML pipeline is also very
important.
And if we can leverage the implementation in FLIP-23 in the future, (some
adjustment might be needed) that would be super helpful.

Best,
Rong


[1]
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-23-Model-Serving-td20260.html


On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:47 AM Shaoxuan Wang <wshaox...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for all the feedback.
>
> @Jincheng Sun
> > I recommend It's better to add a detailed implementation plan to FLIP and
> google doc.
> Yes, I will add a subsection for implementation plan.
>
> @Chen Qin
> >Just share some of insights from operating SparkML side at scale
> >- map reduce may not best way to iterative sync partitioned workers.
> >- native hardware accelerations is key to adopt rapid changes in ML
> improvements in foreseeable future.
> Thanks for sharing your experience on SparkML. The purpose of this FLIP is
> mainly to provide the interfaces for ML pipeline and ML lib, and the
> implementations of most standard algorithms. Besides this FLIP, for AI
> computing on Flink, we will continue to contribute the efforts, like the
> enhancement of iterative and the integration of deep learning engines (such
> as Tensoflow/Pytorch). I have presented part of these work in
>
> https://www.ververica.com/resources/flink-forward-san-francisco-2019/when-table-meets-ai-build-flink-ai-ecosystem-on-table-api
> I am not sure if I have fully got your comments. Can you please elaborate
> them with more details, and if possible, please provide some suggestions
> about what we should work on to address the challenges you have mentioned.
>
> Regards,
> Shaoxuan
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:28 AM Chen Qin <qinnc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just share some of insights from operating SparkML side at scale
> > - map reduce may not best way to iterative sync partitioned workers.
> > - native hardware accelerations is key to adopt rapid changes in ML
> > improvements in foreseeable future.
> >
> > Chen
> >
> > On Apr 29, 2019, at 11:02, jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Shaoxuan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing more efforts for the enhances of the scalability and
> the
> > > ease of use of Flink ML and make it one step further. Thank you for
> > sharing
> > > a lot of context information.
> > >
> > > big +1 for this proposal!
> > >
> > > Here only one suggestion, that is, It has been a short time until the
> > > release of flink-1.9, so I recommend It's better to add a detailed
> > > implementation plan to FLIP and google doc.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jincheng
> > >
> > > Shaoxuan Wang <wshaox...@gmail.com> 于2019年4月29日周一 上午10:34写道:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> Weihua has proposed to rebuild Flink ML pipeline on top of TableAPI
> > several
> > >> months ago in this mail thread:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Embracing-Table-API-in-Flink-ML-td25368.html
> > >>
> > >> Luogen, Becket, Xu, Weihua and I have been working on this proposal
> > >> offline in
> > >> the past a few months. Now we want to share the first phase of the
> > entire
> > >> proposal with a FLIP. In this FLIP-39, we want to achieve several
> things
> > >> (and hope those can be accomplished and released in Flink-1.9):
> > >>
> > >>   -
> > >>
> > >>   Provide a new set of ML core interface (on top of Flink TableAPI)
> > >>   -
> > >>
> > >>   Provide a ML pipeline interface (on top of Flink TableAPI)
> > >>   -
> > >>
> > >>   Provide the interfaces for parameters management and pipeline/mode
> > >>   persistence
> > >>   -
> > >>
> > >>   All the above interfaces should facilitate any new ML algorithm. We
> > will
> > >>   gradually add various standard ML algorithms on top of these new
> > >> proposed
> > >>   interfaces to ensure their feasibility and scalability.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Part of this FLIP has been present in Flink Forward 2019 @ San
> > Francisco by
> > >> Xu and Me.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://sf-2019.flink-forward.org/conference-program#when-table-meets-ai--build-flink-ai-ecosystem-on-table-api
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://sf-2019.flink-forward.org/conference-program#high-performance-ml-library-based-on-flink
> > >>
> > >> You can find the videos & slides at
> > >> https://www.ververica.com/flink-forward-san-francisco-2019
> > >>
> > >> The design document for FLIP-39 can be found here:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1StObo1DLp8iiy0rbukx8kwAJb0BwDZrQrMWub3DzsEo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I am looking forward to your feedback.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Shaoxuan
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to