Thanks for the feedback. I created a PR in https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7843.
@Aljoscha Krettek: Do you think we can include this in the 1.8 branch? – Ufuk On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 3:37 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 from my side for the proposal. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:37 AM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for bringing up this DISCUSS Ufuk! > > > > Makes sense. +1 for doing this. > > > > Best, > > Jincheng > > > > Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> 于2019年2月25日周一 下午10:33写道： > > > > > Dear devs, > > > > > > what are your thoughts about moving flink-python (batch API) to opt > > > instead of having it in lib? The streaming counter part > > > (flink-streaming-python) is only as part of opt. > > > > > > I think we don't have many users of the Python batch API. I think this > > > will make the streaming/batch experience more consistent and would > > > result in a cleaner default classpath. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Ufuk > > > > >
