The proposal has been approved with

+1 votes:
- Timo
- Robert
- Jincheng
- Shengjk1
- Chesnay
- Till

With +4 PMC votes, the vote has passed.

Thanks everybody!
I'll soon start with this effort!

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:06 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 25.02.2019 09:51, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> > You are right. I've fixed it:
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=103089605&selectedPageVersions=7&selectedPageVersions=6
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 4:27 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org
>> > <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Then the respective target components should have a "split
>> >     Job-Submission" migration path attached to them.
>> >     None of the 3 components you just listed have this.
>> >
>> >     On 21.02.2019 16:10, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> >     > Thank you for the minor issues you've found. I addressed them:
>> >     >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=103089605&selectedPageVersions=6&selectedPageVersions=5
>> >     >
>> >     > @Chesnay: Regarding the "Job-Submission": I quickly looked over
>> the
>> >     > tickets. Many of them clearly fit into categories like YARN,
>> >     "Runtime / Web
>> >     > Frontend", "Deployment / Scripts". For the difficult cases,
>> >     we'll find a
>> >     > solution :)
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:57 AM shengjk1 <jsjsjs1...@163.com
>> >     <mailto:jsjsjs1...@163.com>> wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >> +1 for the vote
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >> Also agree with Chesnay Schepler.
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >> There area few minor things  I just noticed, except as
>> >     mentioned in the
>> >     >> Chesnay Schepler email:
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >> * "Scala Shell" is to be renamed to "Scala Shell", but it
>> >     should say keep
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >> Best,
>> >     >> Shengjk1
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >> On 02/20/2019 18:31,Chesnay Schepler<ches...@apache.org
>> >     <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >     >> There area few minor things I just noticed:
>> >     >>
>> >     >> * "Job-Submission" is to be merged into "Command Line Client",
>> >     but I'm
>> >     >> certain that there are issue in that category that also/only
>> apply
>> >     >> to REST. The same applies to Web Client I suppose, which should
>> be
>> >     >> primarily about the WebFrontend / REST API.
>> >     >> * "Quickstarts" is to be renamed to "Quickstarts", but it
>> >     should say keep
>> >     >> * Gelly/CEP should be marked as renamed
>> >     >> * there is no "Twitter" nor "Wikiedits" component that could be
>> >     moved
>> >     >> to "Examples"
>> >     >>
>> >     >> The first point is the important one, whereas the rest are
>> >     probably just
>> >     >> things that slipped through while updating the proposal.
>> >     >>
>> >     >> On 20.02.2019 11:04, Timo Walther wrote:
>> >     >> +1
>> >     >>
>> >     >> Thanks for the proposal.
>> >     >>
>> >     >> Timo
>> >     >>
>> >     >> Am 20.02.19 um 10:53 schrieb Robert Metzger:
>> >     >> Hey all,
>> >     >>
>> >     >> As discussed in the last days, I'm proposing to clean up and
>> >     >> reorganize our
>> >     >> JIRA tickets.
>> >     >> Chesnay proposed to approve the final proposal through a VOTE.
>> >     >>
>> >     >> Here is the proposal:
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Proposal+for+new+JIRA+Components
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >> Please vote with:
>> >     >>
>> >     >> [  ] +1 to agree
>> >     >> [  ]   0 I have no strong opinion
>> >     >> [  ]  -1 to object on the following grounds: ...
>> >     >>
>> >     >> The vote will end on Monday, Feb 25th, 2019, at 11am CET.
>> >     >> The vote will be accepted if there are at least 3 PMC +1s and no
>> >     >> objections.
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to