I agree with Ufuk that we should publish the plan of the following release
on the website, including the release manager, the included features, as
well as feature freezing date, such that the Flink developers can better
plan their time for PR and reviews.

I am also interested in the “release roadmap" mentioned by Robert and
Fabian. I suggest we should open another thread to discuss this separately.
On the one hand, roadmap is a window to introduce the features that
Flink may have in the future to Flink user. More importantly, we need to
provide a way for users to request or prioritize the features they think
are important for them. Before starting to work on any release, we create a
email thread to collect user requested features. If the user wants a
feature in a certain release, he can directly reply to that release email
thread to ask for or raise the priority of that particular feature. We need
spend more efforts to improve user experience. The response time to fix
bugs and address user requested features is one of the most important
criteria.

Regards,
Shaoxuan

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:33 PM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:

> I like the idea of having a road map, but I think that's a separate
> discussion. I'd be happy to chime in a separate discuss thread if you
> want to drive this Fabian/Robert. Now that I'm re-reading my initial
> email, I actually think it sounded a lot like a proposal to add more
> information to the website. Sorry about that. My main question was
> actually the following:
>
> - What is the planned feature freeze date (and planned release date)
> for the 1.8 release?
>
> Best,
>
> Ufuk
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:38 PM Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I like the idea of a roadmap that is kept up-to-date.
> > We've tried that in the past a couple of times but they became outdated
> rather quickly.
> > We've also had a some threads on the dev mailing list to discuss the
> scope & features of next releases.
> >
> > We could discuss and update the roadmap after every release (or even
> feature freeze).
> > IMO, it would be good to have two things on in the document.
> >
> > * a long-term vision (~1 year) where the project is heading to
> > * a roadmap for the next release (~3 months)
> >
> > Cheers, Fabian
> >
> > Am Di., 5. Feb. 2019 um 16:55 Uhr schrieb Robert Metzger <
> rmetz...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> Hey Ufuk,
> >>
> >> I agree! We should have regular discussions here on the list for scoping
> >> releases, and then put this to the website.
> >> The Beam project has a pretty nice roadmap [1] available on their site.
> >> I actually don't really know if there's an agreed upon release schedule
> in
> >> the Flink community (I've not been following the dev@ list closely
> >> recently).
> >> I'll try to find somebody who knows a bit more about the recent Flink
> >> community developments to put together a first draft for such a roadmap.
> >>
> >> [1] https://beam.apache.org/roadmap/
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:29 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey devs,
> >> >
> >> > I've been only following Flink dev loosely in the last couple of
> >> > months and could not find the following information:
> >> >
> >> > What's the schedule for the next release? In particular, when is the
> >> > planned feature freeze and when is the planned release date?
> >> >
> >> > I think this can be valuable information for both devs and users. What
> >> > do you think about adding this information to the Flink website? It
> >> > does not have to be exact dates, but general information such as "we
> >> > do time based releases every X months", "we support the last two minor
> >> > releases with patches", etc. I think this page [1] would be a good
> >> > target for this information.
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> >
> >> > Ufuk
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://flink.apache.org/community.html
> >> >
>

Reply via email to