I have pushed this fix to the release-1.5 branch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10566
Would be great if we could include it because it has been blocking some
pipelines on the Beam side.
Thanks,
Max
On 13.12.18 20:22, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
FLINK-11023: will not be fixed for 1.5.6; this would take significantly longer
to implement, and TBH I'm not really keen on doing that for a final bugfix release.
FLINK-7991: This is just a minor cleanup; the issue doesn't affect users in any
way. It is thus not particularly important to have for this release and can be
omitted IMO; I would also have to double-check whether the open PR applies
properly to 1.5.6, and frankly I don't have the time for that right now anyway.
FLINK-10251: has been in review for a while, but will likely not be merged this
year from what I know.
FLINK-9253: appears to require additional changes and is also quite outdated (it
is from May after all), and looks more like a general improvement than a bug fix
from the JIRA description. I would omit this from the release, unless Nico objects.
On 13.12.2018 17:08, Thomas Weise wrote:
Hi,
I would be interested to try my hand at being the release manger for this.
There are currently still 5 in-progress issues [1], all except [2] with an
open PR.
Nico, Chesnay, Till: Can you please take a look and see if these can be
completed?
Thanks,
Thomas
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=statusCategory%20%3D%20indeterminate%20AND%20project%20%3D%2012315522%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012344315%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20key%20ASC
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9010
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:15 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
Thanks Till and my belated +1 for a final patch release :)
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:47 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
wrote:
Thanks for the feedback! I conclude that the community is in favour of a
last 1.5.6 release. I'll try to make the arrangements in the next two
weeks.
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:40 AM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1. There are incompatible improvements between 1.5.x and 1.6/1.7, so
many
1.5.x users may not be willing to upgrade to 1.6 or 1.7 due to migration
costs, so it makes sense to creating last bug fix release for 1.5
branch.
Bests,
Jincheng
Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> 于2018年12月10日周一 上午9:24写道：
+1, I think very few people would use 1.6 or 1.7 in their production
in
near future, so I expect they would use 1.5 in production for a long
period，it makes sense to provide a stable version for production
usage.
Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> 于2018年12月9日周日 下午6:07写道：
+1. This seems reasonable to me. Since the fixes are already in and
also part of other releases, the release overhead should be
manageable.
@Vino: I agree with your assessment.
@Qi: As Till mentioned, the official project guideline is to support
the last two minor releases, e.g. currently 1.7 and 1.6.
Best,
Ufuk
On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:48 AM qi luo <luoqi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Till,
Does Flink has an agreement on how long will a major version be
supported? Some companies may need a long time to upgrade Flink
major
versions in production. If Flink terminates support for a major
version
too
quickly, it may be a concern for companies.
Best,
Qi
On Dec 8, 2018, at 10:57 AM, vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Till,
I think it makes sense to release a bug fix version (especially
some
serious bug fixes) for flink 1.5.
Consider that some companies' production environments are more
cautious
about upgrading large versions.
I think some organizations are still using 1.5.x or even 1.4.x.
Best,
Vino
Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2018年12月7日周五 下午11:39写道：
Dear community,
I wanted to reach out to you and discuss whether we should
release a
last
bug fix release for the 1.5 branch.
Since we have already released Flink 1.7.0, we only need to
support
the
1.6.x and 1.7.x branches (last two major releases). However,
the
current
release-1.5 branch contains 45 unreleased fixes. Some of the
fixes
address
serializer duplication problems (FLINK-10839, FLINK-10693),
fixing
retractions (FLINK-10674) or prevent a deadlock in the
SpillableSubpartition (FLINK-10491). I think it would be nice
for
our
users
if we officially terminated the Flink 1.5.x support with a last
1.5.6
release. What do you think?
Cheers,
Till
--
Best Regards
Jeff Zhang
