Same as Chesnay +1 for marking bugs as fixed 1.5.0 only
> On 15 Mar 2018, at 07:57, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 to mark bugs as fixed in 1.5.0 only. > > On 15.03.2018 01:40, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We currently have some issues that are marked as resolved for both 1.5.0 and >> 1.6.0 [1]. The reason is that we have the release-1.5 branch and the master >> branch, which will eventually become the branch for 1.6.0. >> >> I think this can lead to confusion because the release notes are created >> based on that data. Say, we fix a bug "foo" after we created the release-1.5 >> branch. Now we will have "[FLINK-xxxx] Fixed foo" in the release notes for >> 1.5.0 and 1.6.0. We basically start our Flink 1.6.0 release notes with >> around 50 issues that were never bugs in 1.6.0 because they were fixed in >> 1.5.0. Plus, having "[FLINK-xxxx] Fixed foo" in the 1.6.0 release notes >> indicates that "foo" was actually a bug in 1.5.0 (because we now had to fix >> it), but it wasn't. >> >> I would propose to remove fixVersion 1.6.0 from all issues that have 1.5.0 >> as fixVersion. What do you think? >> >> On a side note: a bug that is fixed in 1.5.1 should be marked as fixed for >> 1.6.0 separately, because 1.6.0 is not a direct successor to 1.5.1. >> >> Best, >> Aljoscha >> >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.6.0%20and%20resolution%20!%3D%20unresolved > >
