+1 to an immediate 1.4.2 release
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > Since users already reported this on the ML, I'm big +1 to release > immediately. > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai > <tzuli...@apache.org> wrote: > > Since we’re still a bit undecided on FLINK-8451, I think it would be > best to release 1.4.2 with FLINK-8741 now. > > Otherwise, Kafka connectors using custom watermark assigners are > basically unusable right now. > > > > I’ll start the build for RC1 for 1.4.2, and will start the vote by the > end of the day. > > If you object and think we should still try to include FLINK-8451, > please let me know. > > > > Cheers, > > Gordon > > > > On 23 February 2018 at 8:27:38 PM, Stephan Ewen (se...@apache.org) > wrote: > > > > How about releasing 1.4.2 now, meaning immediately. This can be very > > lightweight. > > > > FLINK-8451 looks like it should have more thorough testing and should go > > into 1.4.3. > > I think there is no harm in more frequent bugfix releases. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> I also almost have a fix ready for FLINK-8451. I think it should also go > >> into 1.4.2. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Timo > >> > >> > >> Am 2/22/18 um 11:29 AM schrieb Aljoscha Krettek: > >> > >> They reason they didn't catch this is that the bug only occurs if users > >>> use a custom timestamp/watermark assigner. But yes, we should be able > to > >>> extend the end-to-end tests to catch this. > >>> > >>> On 22. Feb 2018, at 11:05, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> If the Kafka connectors are unusable with 1.4.1, then I would be in > favor > >>>> of releasing 1.4.2 asap. > >>>> > >>>> I'm wondering why the end-to-end Kafka tests did not catch this > problem. > >>>> Maybe we could adapt them such that they guard against it in the > future. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Till > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > >>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> Unfortunately, we've discovered a bug in 1.4.1, which suggests that > we > >>>>> should almost immediately release another bugfix release: > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8741. > >>>>> > >>>>> Since this issue was introduced only in 1.4.1, it might make sense to > >>>>> release 1.4.2 with only the fix for FLINK-8741 included. What do you > >>>>> think? > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Gordon > >>>>> > >>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > >>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > >>>>> 不含病毒。www.avast.com > >>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > >>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > >>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> >
