Hi, I ran the WordCount batch program and noticed the output was split into 5 files.Is there documentation on how the splitting is done and how to tweak it? On Friday, January 19, 2018, 12:06:45 AM PST, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: Great! Thanks for reporting back.
2018-01-19 1:43 GMT+01:00 cw7k <c...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > Ok, I have the factory working in the WordCount example. I had to move > the factory code and META-INF into the WordCount project. > For general Flink jobs, I'm assuming that the goal would be to be able to > import the factory from the job itself instead of needing to copy the > factory .java file into each project? If so, any guidelines on how to do > that? On Thursday, January 18, 2018, 10:53:32 AM PST, cw7k > <c...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Hi, just a bit more info, I have a test function working using oci://, > based on the S3 test: > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-filesystems/flink-s3-fs- > hadoop/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/fs/s3hadoop/ > HadoopS3FileSystemITCase.java#L169 > However, when I try to get the WordCount example's WriteAsText to write to > my new filesystem: > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-examples/flink-examples- > streaming/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/ > examples/wordcount/WordCount.java#L82 > > that's where I got the "Could not find a file system implementation" error > mentioned earlier. > > On Thursday, January 18, 2018, 10:22:57 AM PST, cw7k > <c...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Thanks. I now have the 3 requirements fulfilled but the scheme isn't > being loaded; I get this error: > "Caused by: org.apache.flink.core.fs.UnsupportedFileSystemSchemeException: > Could not find a file system implementation for scheme 'oci'. The scheme is > not directly supported by Flink and no Hadoop file system to support this > scheme could be loaded." > What's the best way to debug the loading of the schemes/filesystems by the > ServiceLoader? On Thursday, January 18, 2018, 5:09:10 AM PST, Fabian > Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In fact, there are two S3FileSystemFactory classes, one for Hadoop and > another one for Presto. > In both cases an external file system class is wrapped in Flink's > HadoopFileSystem class [1] [2]. > > Best, Fabian > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-filesystems/flink-s3-fs- > hadoop/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/fs/s3hadoop/ > S3FileSystemFactory.java#L132 > [2] > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-filesystems/flink-s3-fs- > presto/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/fs/s3presto/ > S3FileSystemFactory.java#L131 > > 2018-01-18 1:24 GMT+01:00 cw7k <c...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > > > Thanks. I'm looking at the s3 example and I can only find the > > S3FileSystemFactory but not the File System implementation (subclass > > of org.apache.flink.core.fs.FileSystem). > > Is that requirement still needed? On Wednesday, January 17, 2018, > > 3:59:47 PM PST, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > please have a look at this doc page [1]. > > It describes how to add new file system implementations and also how to > > configure them. > > > > Best, Fabian > > > > [1] > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs- > > release-1.4/ops/filesystems.html#adding-new-file-system-implementations > > > > 2018-01-18 0:32 GMT+01:00 cw7k <c...@yahoo.com.invalid>: > > > > > Hi, I'm adding support for more cloud storage providers such as Google > > > (gcs://) and Oracle (oci://). > > > I have an oci:// test working based on the s3a:// test but when I try > it > > > on an actual Flink job like WordCount, I get this message: > > > "org.apache.flink.core.fs.UnsupportedFileSystemSchemeException: Could > > not > > > find a file system implementation for scheme 'oci'. The scheme is not > > > directly supported by Flink and no Hadoop file system to support this > > > scheme could be loaded." > > > How do I register new schemes into the file system factory? Thanks. > > On > > > Tuesday, January 16, 2018, 5:27:31 PM PST, cw7k <c...@yahoo.com.INVALID > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, question on this page: > > > "You need to point Flink to a valid Hadoop configuration..."https://ci > . > > > apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.4/ops/ > > > deployment/aws.html#s3-simple-storage-service > > > How do you point Flink to the Hadoop config? > > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018, 4:56:15 AM PST, Till Rohrmann < > > > trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > the flink-connector-filesystem contains the BucketingSink which is a > > > connector with which you can write your data to a file system. It > > provides > > > exactly once processing guarantees and allows to write data to > different > > > buckets [1]. > > > > > > The flink-filesystem module contains different file system > > implementations > > > (like mapr fs, hdfs or s3). If you want to use, for example, s3 file > > > system, then there is the flink-s3-fs-hadoop and flink-s3-fs-presto > > module. > > > > > > So if you want to write your data to s3 using the BucketingSink, then > you > > > have to add flink-connector-filesystem for the BucketingSink as well > as a > > > s3 file system implementations (e.g. flink-s3-fs-hadoop or > > > flink-s3-fs-presto). > > > > > > Usually, there should be no need to change Flink's filesystem > > > implementations. If you want to add a new connector, then this would go > > to > > > flink-connectors or to Apache Bahir [2]. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/dev/connectors/ > > > filesystem_sink.html > > > > > > [2] > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs- > > > master/dev/connectors/index.html#connectors-in-apache-bahir > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Till > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:22 PM, cw7k <c...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, I'm trying to understand the difference between the > > flink-filesystem > > > > and flink-connector-filesystem. How is each intended to be used? > > > > If adding support for a different storage provider that supports > HDFS, > > > > should additions be made to one or the other, or both? Thanks. > > > > > > > > >
