@Eron Given that this is actually an undocumented "internal" feature at
this point, I would not expect that it is used heavily beyond Pravega.

Unless you feel strongly that this is a major issue, I would go ahead with
the release...

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks for the update! I would also say it's not a blocker but we should
> make sure that we don't break this after 1.4, then.
>
> > On 7. Dec 2017, at 22:37, Eron Wright <eronwri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just discovered:  the removal of Flink's Future (FLINK-7252) causes a
> > breaking change in connectors that use
> > `org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.MasterTriggerRestoreHook`, because
> > `Future` is a type on one of the methods.
> >
> > To my knowledge, this affects only the Pravega connector.  Curious to
> know
> > whether any other connectors are affected.  I don't think we (Dell EMC)
> > consider it a blocker but it will mean that the connector is Flink 1.4+.
> >
> > Eron
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I just noticed that I did a copy-and-paste error and the last paragraph
> >> about voting period should be this:
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Aljoscha
> >>
> >>> On 7. Dec 2017, at 19:24, Bowen Li <bowen...@offerupnow.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I agree that it shouldn't block the release. The doc website part is
> even
> >>> better!
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Good catch, yes. This shouldn't block the release, though, since the
> doc
> >>>> is always built form the latest state of a release branch, i.e. the
> 1.4
> >> doc
> >>>> on the website will update as soon as the doc on the release-1.4
> branch
> >> is
> >>>> updated.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 6. Dec 2017, at 20:47, Bowen Li <bowen...@offerupnow.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Aljoscha,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I found Flink's State doc and javaDoc are very ambiguous on what the
> >>>>> replacement of FoldingState is, which will confuse a lot of users. We
> >>>> need
> >>>>> to fix it in 1.4 release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have submitted a PR at https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5129
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Bowen
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> aljos...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please review and vote on release candidate #3 for the version
> 1.4.0,
> >> as
> >>>>>> follows:
> >>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >> includes:
> >>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> >> to
> >>>> be
> >>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org[2], which are signed with the key with
> >>>>>> fingerprint F2A67A8047499BBB3908D17AA8F4FD97121D7293 [3],
> >>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.4.0-rc1" [5],
> >>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release [6].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please have a careful look at the website PR because I changed some
> >>>>>> wording and we're now also releasing a binary without Hadoop
> >>>> dependencies.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [7]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The only change between RC1 and this RC2 is that the source release
> >>>>>> package does not include the erroneously included binary Ruby
> >>>> dependencies
> >>>>>> of the documentation anymore. Because of this I would like to
> propose
> >> a
> >>>>>> shorter voting time and close the vote around the time that RC1
> would
> >>>> have
> >>>>>> closed. This would mean closing by end of Wednesday. Please let me
> >> know
> >>>> if
> >>>>>> you disagree with this. The vote is adopted by majority approval,
> with
> >>>> at
> >>>>>> least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Your friendly Release Manager
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >>>>>> projectId=12315522&version=12340533
> >>>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aljoscha/flink-1.4.0-rc3/
> >>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>> orgapacheflink-1141
> >>>>>> [5] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=
> >>>>>> 8fb9635dd2e64dbb20887c84f646f02034b57cb1
> >>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/95
> >>>>>> [7] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cOkycJwEKVjG_
> >>>>>> onnpl3bQNTq7uebh48zDtIJxceyU2E/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <settings>
> >>>>>> <activeProfiles>
> >>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-1.4.0</activeProfile>
> >>>>>> </activeProfiles>
> >>>>>> <profiles>
> >>>>>> <profile>
> >>>>>> <id>flink-1.4.0</id>
> >>>>>> <repositories>
> >>>>>>  <repository>
> >>>>>>    <id>flink-1.4.0</id>
> >>>>>>    <url>
> >>>>>>        https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>>>> orgapacheflink-1141/
> >>>>>>    </url>
> >>>>>>  </repository>
> >>>>>>  <repository>
> >>>>>>    <id>archetype</id>
> >>>>>>    <url>
> >>>>>>        https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>>>>> orgapacheflink-1141/
> >>>>>>    </url>
> >>>>>>  </repository>
> >>>>>> </repositories>
> >>>>>> </profile>
> >>>>>> </profiles>
> >>>>>> </settings>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
> >>>>>> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based
> >> on
> >>>> the
> >>>>>> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to