FLINK-7211 is a trivial change for excluding the gelly examples javadoc from 
the release assembly and would be good to have fixed for 1.3.2.


> On Jul 13, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I agree that FLINK-6951 should also be a blocker for 1.3.2. I’ll update its 
> priority.
> 
> On 13 July 2017 at 4:06:06 PM, Bowen Li (bowen...@offerupnow.com) wrote:
> 
> Hi Aljoscha,  
> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6951 fixed  
> in 1.3.2, if it makes sense.  
> 
> Thanks,  
> Bowen  
> 
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>  
> wrote:  
> 
>> Short update, we resolved some blockers and discovered some new ones.  
>> There’s this nifty Jira page if you want to keep track:  
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12340984 <  
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12340984>  
>> 
>> Once again, could everyone please update the Jira issues that they think  
>> should be release blocking. I would like to start building release  
>> candidates at the end of this week, if possible.  
>> 
>> And yes, I’m volunteering to be the release manager on this release. ;-)  
>> 
>> Best,  
>> Aljoscha  
>> 
>>> On 7. Jul 2017, at 16:03, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:  
>>> 
>>> I think we might have another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/  
>> jira/browse/FLINK-7133 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7133>  
>>> 
>>>> On 7. Jul 2017, at 09:18, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> wrote:  
>>>> 
>>>> I think we are pretty close now -- Jira shows that we're down to two  
>>>> blockers: FLINK-7069 and FLINK-6965.  
>>>> 
>>>> FLINK-7069 is being merged and we have a PR for FLINK-6965.  
>>>> 
>>>> ~Haohui  
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:44 AM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>  
>> wrote:  
>>>> 
>>>>> I’m seeing these remaining blockers:  
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7069?filter=  
>> 12334772&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%  
>> 20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved  
>>>>> <  
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7069?filter=  
>> 12334772&jql=project%20=%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20=%  
>> 20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved  
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could everyone please correctly mark as “blocking” those issues that  
>> they  
>>>>> consider blocking for 1.3.2 so that we get an accurate overview of  
>> where we  
>>>>> are.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> @Chesnay, could you maybe check if this one should in fact be  
>> considered a  
>>>>> blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7034? <  
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7034?>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,  
>>>>> Aljoscha  
>>>>>> On 6. Jul 2017, at 07:19, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>  
>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> FLINK-7041 has been merged.  
>>>>>> I’d also like to raise another blocker for 1.3.2:  
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6996.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,  
>>>>>> Gordon  
>>>>>> On 30 June 2017 at 12:46:07 AM, Aljoscha Krettek (aljos...@apache.org  
>> )  
>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gordon and I found this (in my opinion) blocking issue:  
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7041 <  
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7041>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’m trying to quickly provide a fix.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 26. Jun 2017, at 15:30, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I just opened a PR which should be included in the next bug fix  
>> release  
>>>>> for the Table API:  
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7005  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Timo  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 23.06.17 um 14:09 schrieb Robert Metzger:  
>>>>>>>> Thanks Haohui.  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The first main task for the release management is to come up with a  
>>>>>>>> timeline :)  
>>>>>>>> Lets just wait and see which issues get reported. There are  
>> currently  
>>>>> no  
>>>>>>>> blockers set for 1.3.1 in JIRA.  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com>  
>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi,  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Release management is though, I'm happy to help. Are there any  
>>>>> timelines  
>>>>>>>>> you have in mind?  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Haohui  
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:01 AM Robert Metzger <  
>> rmetz...@apache.org>  
>>>>>>>>> wrote:  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> with the 1.3.1 release on the way, we can start thinking about the  
>>>>> 1.3.2  
>>>>>>>>>> release.  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> We have already one issue that should go in there:  
>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6964  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> If there are any other blockers, let us know here :)  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering if there's somebody from the community who's  
>> willing to  
>>>>>>>>> take  
>>>>>>>>>> care of the release management of 1.3.2 :)  
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to