I'm +1 for changing the profile and to start a discussion to drop Scala 2.10.
Scala 2.10 is already quite old and the current stable version is 2.12. I would be surprised to see many people still using Scala 2.10. Cheers, Till On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the KIP that drops support for Scala 2.10 in Kafka 0.11 : > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 119%3A+Drop+Support+for+Scala+2.10+in+Kafka+0.11 > > FYI > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Piotr Nowojski <pi...@data-artisans.com> > wrote: > > > Yes, I know and I’m proposing to change this in parent pom by default to > > scala-2.11. > > > > Changing parent pom every time anyone wants to touch/build in Intellij > > Kafka 0.11 connector is not a great idea. This would require a developer > to > > constantly stash those changes or commit and revert them before creating > a > > pull request. > > > > Piotrek > > > > > On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote: > > > > > > You don't need to use the build profile in IntelliJ, just change > > > scala.version and scala.binary.version in the parent pom (recent > > > refactorings made this possible without changing every pom). > > > > > > What is the benefit for changing the default without dropping older > > > versions when contributions are still limited to the functionality of > the > > > old version? > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Piotr Nowojski < > pi...@data-artisans.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I propose to switch to Scala 2.11 as a default and to have a Scala > 2.10 > > >> build profile. Now it is other way around. The reason for that is poor > > >> support for build profiles in Intellij, I was unable to make it work > > after > > >> I added Kafka 0.11 dependency (Kafka 0.11 dropped support for Scala > > 2.10). > > >> > > >> As a side note, maybe we should also consider dropping Scala 2.10 > > support? > > >> > > >> Piotrek > > > > >
