Robert has an open PR from March. I’ve found, for example, PRs adding links to talks or slides left open for months.
I’d suggest Fluo is to Accumulo as flink-web is to the flink repo, and that migration looks to be satisfactory. > On Jun 9, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > bq. better track the oft-neglected contributions > > Do you have estimate on how many contributions were not paid attention in > the current infrastructure. > > Looking at #2, it seems Accumulo community hasn't reached consensus yet. > > Cheers > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> ASF now has available (and maybe mandatory for new projects or repos) >> GitBox [0] which enables bi-directional sync to GitHub and links >> committers' accounts, allowing for greater use of GitHub functionality by >> contributors and for committers to perform many tasks otherwise requiring >> INFRA tickets. >> >> I'd like to propose moving flink-web [1] to GitBox, using GitHub issues, >> and enabling notifications to the mailing lists. Apache Accumulo has >> recently discussed [2] this topic with a list of benefits after migrating >> Fluo. By migrating flink-web we can better track the oft-neglected >> contributions and also test the waters for future migrations (perhaps for >> the future sub-projects). >> >> [0] https://gitbox.apache.org/ >> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pulls >> [2] >> http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS- >> GitBox-tp21160p21497.html >> >> Greg
