1) Flink 1.2 dropped Hadoop 1 but we don’t have a replacement “default”.
2) I’ll create a ticket to bump to the latest patch versions. 3) Uncertain if we can drop Hadoop 2.3 and/or 2.4. > On Apr 30, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For #1, +1 on dropping hadoop 1. > > For #2, we can reference Hadoop 2.7 > BTW I think we can bump to 2.7.3 as dependency. > > For #3, Hadoop 2.8.0 was marked not production ready. Junping is in the > process of releasing 2.8.1 > It would be good idea to start testing against 2.8.0 now > > Cheers > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com > <mailto:c...@greghogan.com>> wrote: > >> Hi Flink, >> >> I filed a ticket [0] that our download page [1] still states >> >> “You don’t have to install Hadoop to use Flink, but if you plan to use >> Flink with data stored in Hadoop, pick the version matching your installed >> Hadoop version. If you don’t want to do this, pick the Hadoop 1 version.” >> >> 1) We no longer offer the Hadoop 1 version, which I expect was chosen due >> to its smaller size. What is the new recommendation? >> >> 2) Should we reference, for example, “Hadoop 2.7” (as with the binary >> filenames) rather than “Hadoop 2.7.0” since we are actually testing and >> releasing against Hadoop 2.7.2? >> >> 3) Should Flink 1.3.0 support the recently released Hadoop 2.8.0? Is this >> the time to drop older versions (which users can easily build)? This would >> also be the time to bump the patch versions in .travis.yml and >> create-release-files.sh. >> >> I ask because I think it is important to present this choice well since it >> is likely to be a new users first decision point. >> >> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6399 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6399 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6399>> >> [1] https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html >> <https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html> <https://flink.apache.org/ >> <https://flink.apache.org/> >> downloads.html> >> >> Greg
