Good point. I've included it into the pull request. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should FLINK-6353 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6353> be > mentioned in the announcement ? > > Cheers > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I've uploaded the artifacts to the apache mirrors and released the maven > > stuff to central. > > > > While the artifacts are syncing, please review the release announcement: > > https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/54 > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Okay, I'll then put out the release. > > > > > > > > > The vote to release this package as Flink 1.2.1 has passed with: > > > > > > +1 votes: > > > - Andrew (non-binding) > > > - Gyula (binding) > > > - Till (binding) > > > - Greg (binding) > > > - Henry (binding) > > > > > > No 0 or -1 votes. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Agreed, as I said above: > > >> > > >> >>>> I have the fix ready but we can do that in Flink 1.2.2. Very > > quickly, > > >> >>>> though. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Aljoscha > > >> > > >> > On 24. Apr 2017, at 13:19, Ufuk Celebi <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > I agree with Till and would NOT cancel this release. It has been > > >> > delayed already quite a bit already and the feature freeze for 1.3.0 > > >> > is coming up (i.e. most contributors will be busy and not spend a > lot > > >> > of time for 1.2.1). > > >> > > > >> > – Ufuk > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Till Rohrmann < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> If this bug was already present in 1.2.0, then I guess not many > users > > >> have > > >> >> used this feature. Otherwise we would have seen complaints on the > > >> mailing > > >> >> list. > > >> >> > > >> >> From the JIRA issue description, it looks as if we have to fix it > for > > >> 1.3.0 > > >> >> anyway. What about fixing it this week and then backporting it to > the > > >> 1.2.1 > > >> >> branch? > > >> >> > > >> >> Cheers, > > >> >> Till > > >> >> > > >> >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > [email protected] > > >> > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> It means that users cannot restore from 1.2.0 to 1.2.0, 1.2.0 to > > >> 1.2.1, or > > >> >>> 1.2.1 to 1.2.1. However, this only happens when using the > > >> >>> CheckpointedRestoring interface, which you have to do when you > want > > to > > >> >>> migrate away form the Checkpointed interface. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> tl;dr It’s not a new bug but one that was present in 1.2.0 > already. > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> On 23. Apr 2017, at 21:16, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> @all: I'm sorry for being a bad release manager this time. I'm > not > > >> >>> spending > > >> >>>> much time online these days. I hope to increase my dev@ list > > >> activity a > > >> >>>> little bit next week. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> @Aljoscha: > > >> >>>> Does this mean that users can not upgrade from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 ? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Can we make the minor versions easily compatible? > > >> >>>> If so, I would prefer to cancel this release as well and do > another > > >> one. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> There is this (somewhat pesky) issue: > > >> >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6353: Restoring > > using > > >> >>>>> CheckpointedRestoring does not work from 1.2 to 1.2 > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> I have the fix ready but we can do that in Flink 1.2.2. Very > > >> quickly, > > >> >>>>> though. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>> On 20. Apr 2017, at 17:20, Henry Saputra < > > [email protected]> > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> LICENSE file exists > > >> >>>>>> NOTICE file looks good > > >> >>>>>> Signature files look good > > >> >>>>>> Hash files look good > > >> >>>>>> No 3rd party exes in source artifact > > >> >>>>>> Source compiled and pass tests > > >> >>>>>> Local run work > > >> >>>>>> Run simple job on YARN > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> +1 > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> - Henry > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Robert Metzger < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Dear Flink community, > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Flink > > >> >>> version > > >> >>>>>>> 1.2 > > >> >>>>>>> .1. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: > > >> >>>>>>> 76eba4e0 <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > repos/asf/flink/commit/ > > >> >>> 76eba4e0> > > >> >>>>>>> (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/ > 76eba4e0 > > >> >>>>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/76eba4e0 > > >*) > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Branch: > > >> >>>>>>> release-1.2.1-rc2 > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > >> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc2/ > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > > >> >>> D9839159: > > >> >>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > >> >>>>>>> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> >>> orgapacheflink-1117 > > >> >>>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> >>> orgapacheflink-1117 > > >> >>>>>> * > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> The vote ends on Tuesday, 1pm CET. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.2.1 > > >> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
