Hi Gyula, I'm trying to push Stefan R. to get the RocksDB fixes in asap.
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Any updates on this? > > It would be nice to get this out soon, the Kafka bug is hurting our prod > jobs big time. > > Thanks, > Gyula > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017, 15:27 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > @Stefan: What's the state with the RocksDB fixes? I would be +1 to do > this. > > > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > Yes, aljoscha already opened one against master: > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3670 > > > > > > On 04.04.2017 17:57, Ted Yu wrote: > > >> > > >> Should the commits be reverted from master branch as well ? > > >> > > >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> The commits around FLINK-5808 have been reverted on release-1.2. > > >>> > > >>>> On 4. Apr 2017, at 12:16, Stefan Richter < > s.rich...@data-artisans.com > > > > > >>> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I have created a custom build of RocksDB 4.11.2 that fixes a > > significant > > >>> > > >>> performance problem with append operations. I think this should > > >>> definitely > > >>> be part of the 1.2.1 release because this is already blocking some > > users. > > >>> What is missing is uploading the jar to maven central and a testing > > run, > > >>> e.g. with some misbehaved job that has large state. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> Am 04.04.2017 um 11:57 schrieb Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org > >: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thank you for opening a PR for this. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Chesnay, do you need more reviews for the metrics changes / > > backports? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Are there any other release blockers for 1.2.1, or are we good to > go? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > aljos...@apache.org> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I created a PR for the revert: https://github.com/apache/ > > >>> > > >>> flink/pull/3664 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 3. Apr 2017, at 18:32, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 for options (1), but also invest the time to fix it properly > for > > >>> > > >>> 1.2.2 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Kostas Kloudas < > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> k.klou...@data-artisans.com> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 for 1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2017, at 5:52 PM, Till Rohrmann < > trohrm...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for option 1) > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Fabian Hueske < > fhue...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 to option 1) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2017-04-03 16:57 GMT+02:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Looks like #1 is better - 1.2.1 would be at least as stable > as > > >>> > > >>> 1.2.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just so we’re all on the same page. ;-) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> There was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5808 > > which > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> bug that we initially discovered in Flink 1.2 which was/is > > about > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> missing > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> verification for the correctness of the combination of > > >>> > > >>> parallelism > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> max-parallelism. Due to lacking test coverage this > introduced > > >>>>>>>>>>>> two > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> more > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> bugs: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188: Some > > >>>>>>>>>>>> setParallelism() methods can't cope with default parallelism > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6209: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> StreamPlanEnvironment always has a parallelism of 1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO, the options are: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) revert the changes made for FLINK-5808 on the release-1.2 > > >>> > > >>> branch > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> live with the bug still being present > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) put in more work to fix FLINK-5808 which requires fixing > > some > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> problems > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that have existed for a long time with how the parallelism > is > > >>> > > >>> set in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> streaming programs > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31. Mar 2017, at 21:34, Robert Metzger < > > rmetz...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what is best to do, but I think releasing > 1.2.1 > > >>> > > >>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> potentially more bugs than 1.2.0 is not a good option. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect a good workaround for FLINK-6188 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188> is > > setting > > >>> > > >>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism manually for operators that can't cope with the > > >>> > > >>> default > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean reverting the changes around FLINK-5808 [1]? This > > is > > >>> > > >>> what > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced the follow-up FLINK-6188 [2]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5808 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017, at 19:10, Robert Metzger wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think reverting FLINK-6188 for the 1.2 branch might be > a > > >>> > > >>> good > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> idea. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-6188 introduced two new bugs, so undoing the > > FLINK-6188 > > >>> > > >>> fix > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lead > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to one known bug in 1.2.1, instead of an uncertain > > >>> > > >>> number of > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So 1.2.1 is not going to be worse than 1.2.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fix will hopefully make it into 1.2.2 then. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any other thoughts on this? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Fabian Hueske < > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> fhue...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I merged the fix for FLINK-6044 to the release-1.2 and > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> release-1.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-03-31 15:02 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske < > > fhue...@gmail.com > > >>>> > > >>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also backport the fix for FLINK-6044 to Flink > > >>> > > >>> 1.2.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll take care of that. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-03-30 18:50 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> aljos...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 > turns > > >>> > > >>> out to > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more involved, see my comments on the PR: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I said there, maybe we should revert the commits > > >>> > > >>> regarding > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism/max-parallelism changes and release and > then > > >>> > > >>> fix > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> later. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 23:08, Aljoscha Krettek > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I commented on FLINK-6214: I think it's working as > > >>> > > >>> intended, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> although > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could fix the javadoc/doc. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 17:35, Timo Walther wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A user reported that all tumbling and slinding > window > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> assigners > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a pretty obvious bug about offsets. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6214 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should also fix this for 1.2.1. What do > you > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> think? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timo > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29/03/17 um 11:30 schrieb Robert Metzger: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Haohui, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that we should fix the parallelism issue. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Otherwise, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.2.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release would introduce a new bug. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Haohui Mai < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricet...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We recently found out that all jobs submitted via > UI > > >>> > > >>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism of 1, potentially due to FLINK-5808. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Filed FLINK-6209 to track it. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Haohui > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:59 AM Chesnay Schepler < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ches...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If possible I would like to include FLINK-6183 & > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> FLINK-6184 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They fix 2 metric-related issues that could arise > > >>> > > >>> when a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Task is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancelled very early. (like, right away) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-6183 fixes a memory leak where the > > >>> > > >>> TaskMetricGroup > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never closed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-6184 fixes a NullPointerExceptions in the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffer > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR here: https://github.com/apache/ > flink/pull/3611 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26.03.2017 12:35, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I opened a PR for FLINK-6188: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink/pull/3616 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This improves the previously very sparse test > > >>> > > >>> coverage > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/watermark assigners and fixes the bug. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Ufuk Celebi < > > >>> > > >>> u...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Aljoscha. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 because of FLINK-6188 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Aljoscha > > Krettek < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I filed this issue, which was observed by a > > user: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that’s blocking for 1.2.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24 Mar 2017, at 18:57, Ufuk Celebi < > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> u...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC1 doesn't contain Stefan's backport for the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Asynchronous > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshots > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for heap-based keyed state that has been > > merged. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC2 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with that fix since the voting period only > > starts > > >>> > > >>> on > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would only mean rerunning the scripts on > > your > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> side, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Robert > > Metzger < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Flink community, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following > > candidate > > >>> > > >>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 1.2 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *732e55bd* (* > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 732e55bd > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55b > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d>*) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-1.2.1-rc1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> at: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *http://people.apache.org/~ > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/~ > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/ > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> * > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the > key > > >>> > > >>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D9839159: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can > be > > >>> > > >>> found > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ > > >
