Did any user have problems with the Flink 1.1 behaviour? If not, we could disable it again, by default, and add a flag for adding the user jar to all the classpaths.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 14:50 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > I agree with you Gyula, this change is dangerous. I have seen another case > from a user with Hadoop dependencies that crashed in Flink 1.2.0 that > didn't in 1.1.x > > I wonder if we should introduce a config flag for Flink 1.2.1 to disable > the behavior if needed. > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I was not aware of this big change (I know it's my fault) but I am not > > sure > > > if I agree with the rationale. > > > > No comment on the actual issue from my side, but I strongly disagree > > that this is your fault. We should have covered this better in the > > release announcement in my opinion. Of course, this doesn't help now. > > ;-) > > > > – Ufuk > > >