Did any user have problems with the Flink 1.1 behaviour? If not, we could
disable it again, by default, and add a flag for adding the user jar to all
the classpaths.

On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 14:50 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:

> I agree with you Gyula, this change is dangerous. I have seen another case
> from a user with Hadoop dependencies that crashed in Flink 1.2.0 that
> didn't in 1.1.x
>
> I wonder if we should introduce a config flag for Flink 1.2.1 to disable
> the behavior if needed.
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I was not aware of this big change (I know it's my fault) but I am not
> > sure
> > > if I agree with the rationale.
> >
> > No comment on the actual issue from my side, but I strongly disagree
> > that this is your fault. We should have covered this better in the
> > release announcement in my opinion. Of course, this doesn't help now.
> > ;-)
> >
> > – Ufuk
> >
>

Reply via email to