@Anton - I agree, that class is pretty ugly and mostly leftover code. +1 for tearing it apart (and dropping as much code of it as possible in the process)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Jark Wu <wuchong...@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > Hi Anton, > > Thanks for bringing up this discussion. > > I think TestBaseUtils is a util class not a base class to extend. > All the methods in TestBaseUtils are static, that means we can > use any method directly without extend it. > > Thanks, Jark > > > 在 2017年1月26日，上午7:46，Anton Solovev <anton_solo...@epam.com> 写道： > > > > Hello guys, > > > > I think there is a sense to tear apart TestBaseUtils into a number of > util classes which it keeps them. > > Because some test classes can't extend this base test class, but need in > its result checkers > > > > Best, > > Anton > > > > > >
