I definitively agree, if we can cover the functionality with all ES
dependency versions.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As part of restructuring the ES connectors, I think it also a very good
> timing to unify how our ES connectors are used.
>
> For the 1.x connector, users provide a “IndexRequestBuilder” that was only
> capable of indexing a single document for each record.
> For the 2.x and pending 5.x connector, the API was improved to let users
> provide a “ElasticsearchSinkFunction” that can yield many ES actions
> (modify, index, delete, etc.) for each record.
>
> I’m not sure of the history on this, but it seems like the API improvement
> to 2.x+ wasn’t reflected also on the 1.x connector at the time.
>
> I’d like to deprecate the “IndexRequestBuilder” constructor variant in
> 1.x, and let it have a new constructor that takes
> “ElasticsearchSinkFunction” like the other versions.
> This will also have the advantage of much cleaner structure across the ES
> connector modules. What do you think?
>
> - Gordon
>
> On January 9, 2017 at 10:50:55 PM, Kostas Tzoumas (ktzou...@apache.org)
> wrote:
>
> +1 for keeping the ES connector in Flink
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for bringing this up again Flavio.
> >
> > The good thing about a common base for all ES connectors is that we can
> fix
> > the issue for all ES versions (ideally).
> >
> > Thanks a lot for taking care of my proposed changes Gordon!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
> pomperma...@okkam.it>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5353 should
> be
> > > solved sooner or later...
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Flavio
> > >
> > > On 9 Jan 2017 12:24, "Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai" <tzuli...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for starting the discussion Robert.
> > > >
> > > > I agree that we should try to treat the Elasticsearch connectors in a
> > > > similar fashion to the multiple Kafka connector versions.
> > > >
> > > > +1 for flink-connector-elasticsearch-base
> > > > +1 to consolidating the documents
> > > > +1 for keeping the ES connector in Flink
> > > >
> > > > I’d also like to proceed with this with https://github.com/apache/
> > > > flink/pull/2767, by opening another new PR based on #2767 that also
> > > > refactors the ES connectors & consolidates documentation.
> > > > After that, we can proceed with https://github.com/apache/flin
> > > k/pull/2861 for
> > > > the proper at least once support across all ES versions.
> > > >
> > > > - Gordon
> > > >
> > > > On December 19, 2016 at 11:58:03 PM, Fabian Hueske (
> fhue...@gmail.com)
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for looking into this Robert.
> > > > I agree, it would be good to share as much code as possible between
> the
> > > > Elasticsearch connectors.
> > > >
> > > > +1 for flink-connector-elasticsearch-base
> > > > +1 for keeping the connectors in Flink
> > > >
> > > > 2016-12-19 16:46 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I'm wondering how we want to maintain the ElasticSearch sinks in
> > Flink.
> > > > >
> > > > > Right now, we have two connectors, supporting the 1.x and 2.x
> > versions.
> > > > > There is a pending PR [1] for adding ES 5 support.
> > > > >
> > > > > All three connectors share a lot of code, and there is a pull
> request
> > > [2]
> > > > > improving the ES 2.x connector. If we want to make the ES sinks
> have
> > > > proper
> > > > > at least once support, we need to do some more changes, and I would
> > > like
> > > > to
> > > > > do them once for all connectors.
> > > > > I propose to create a new "flink-connector-elasticsearch-base"
> > module
> > > > with
> > > > > the common code and then create modules for 1.x, 2.x and 5.x.
> > > > > Also, I would merge the documentation pages into one.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would also be open to discuss whether we want to move the EL
> > > connectors
> > > > > into Bahir.
> > > > > For now, I'm against that, given that ES is among the more popular
> > > > > connectors in Flink.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Robert
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2767
> > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2861
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to