Hi! I am still scanning it and compiling some comments. Give me a bit ;-)
Stephan On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Paris Carbone <par...@kth.se> wrote: > Hey all, > > Now that many of you have already scanned the document (judging from the > views) maybe it is time to give back some feedback! > Did you like it? Would you suggest an improvement? > > I would suggest not to leave this in the void. It has to do with important > properties that the system promises to provide. > Me and Fouad will do our best to answer your questions and discuss this > further. > > cheers > Paris > > On 21 Oct 2016, at 08:54, Paris Carbone <par...@kth.se<mailto:parisc@ > kth.se>> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Loops in Apache Flink have a good potential to become a much more powerful > thing in future version of Apache Flink. > There is generally high demand to make them usable and first of all > production-ready for upcoming releases. > > As a first commitment we would like to propose FLIP-13 for consistent > processing with Loops. > We are also working on scoped loops for Q1 2017 which we can share if > there is enough interest. > > For now, that is an improvement proposal that solves two pending major > issues: > > 1) The (not so trivial) problem of correct termination of jobs with > iterations > 2) The applicability of the checkpointing algorithm to iterative dataflow > graphs. > > We would really appreciate it if you go through the linked draft > (motivation and proposed changes) for FLIP-13 and point out comments, > preferably publicly in this devlist discussion before we go ahead and > update the wiki. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M6ERj-TzlykMLHzPSwW5L9b0BhDbtoYucmBy > BjRBISs/edit?usp=sharing > > cheers > > Paris and Fouad > > >
