Okay, this sounds prudent. Would this be the right time to implement FLINK-2268 "Provide Flink binary release without Hadoop"?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for dropping Hadoop1 support > > @greg There is quite some complexity in the build setup and release scripts > and testing to support Hadoop 1. Also, we have to prepare to add support > for Hadoop 3, and then supporting in addition Hadoop 1 seems very tough. > > Stephan > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > > What are the benefits to Flink for dropping Hadoop 1 support? Is there > > significant code cleanup or would we simply be publishing one less set of > > artifacts? > > > > Greg > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The Apache Hadoop community has recently released the first alpha > version > > > for Hadoop 3.0.0, while we are still supporting Hadoop 1. I think its > > time > > > to finally drop Hadoop 1 support in Flink. > > > > > > The last minor Hadoop 1 release was in 27 June, 2014. > > > Apache Spark dropped Hadoop 1 support with their 2.0 release in July > > 2016. > > > Hadoop 2.2 was first released in October 2013, so there was enough time > > > for users to upgrade. > > > > > > I added also the user@ list to the discussion to get opinions about > this > > > from there as well. > > > > > > Let me know what you think about this! > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Robert > > > > > >
