I'll merge https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2548 for the release.
It's cosmetic but it avoids a NPE in case the user jar doesn't contain
Flink jobs.

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Kostas Kloudas
<k.klou...@data-artisans.com> wrote:
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> Thanks for being the release manager.
>
> There is already an open PR under review for the Continuous File Sources.
>
> Kostas
>
>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 11:25 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your prompt responses.
>>
>> Except for the streaming file source issues, all mentioned issues are
>> addressed. As soon as the last one is in, I can kick off the first RC.
>>
>> @Kostas, Stephan: you didn't mention anything here or in the PR. Did
>> you have time to work on this? :)
>>
>> – Ufuk
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Concerning the Pull Requests about Kafka 0.8 offset committing:
>>>
>>> They look good, but I would actually like to not merge them to Flink 1.1.3,
>>> as they may result in slightly changed behavior for users of Kafka 0.8
>>>
>>> The crucial fix (Kafka 0.9) is already in, so on the Kafka side are are
>>> good to go, in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Ufuk for stepping up as RM!
>>>>
>>>> Regarding whether FLINK-4723 / FLINK-4727 should be included:
>>>> The failing test on PR #2580 is unrelated to the change.
>>>> However, I think it’s reasonable to skip them if we’re aiming to get a RC
>>>> out today, as they’ll need more time for reviewing.
>>>> Not including them will only pose problems if users are consuming Kafka
>>>> topics across Flink’s connector & high-level Kafka consumers when using
>>>> Kafka 0.8.
>>>>
>>>> We don’t really have users reporting problems on this yet, so I’d say it’s
>>>> ok to skip them for 1.1.3 :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On October 4, 2016 at 6:12:06 PM, Fabian Hueske (fhue...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Ufuk for stepping up as release manager!
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I will backport the fix for FLINK-4311 to Flink 1.1.3 and merge it
>>>> today.
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-04 12:07 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> If there are no objections I would like to be the release manager for
>>>>> this release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Futhermore, I would like to add FLINK-4732 (Maven junction plugin
>>>>> security issue) to the list of fixes for this release. Other than
>>>>> that, I think the list in this thread is good and we should now focus
>>>>> on getting a RC out. I would really like to do this today in order to
>>>>> start testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> The current state of affairs is as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> - FLINK-4732 (Maven junction plugin security issue) has a fix in
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2586. @Max: Can you merge this
>>>>> today?
>>>>>
>>>>> - FLINK-4702 (Kafka async offset commit) has been merged.
>>>>>
>>>>> - FLINK-4329 (streaming file sources) has a fix in
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2546, which needs both another
>>>>> round of review and backporting to 1.1. Kostas Kloudas is working on
>>>>> this with Stephan as reviewer. @Stephan, Kostas: Do you think that
>>>>> this can be merged today?
>>>>>
>>>>> - FLINK-4311 (TableInputFormat) has a fix in
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2330 and is good to merge
>>>>> according to Fabian. @Fabian: Can you merge this today?
>>>>>
>>>>> - FLINK-4727 (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2580) and
>>>>> FLINK-4723 (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2585) have been
>>>>> issued recently and look like they could be skipped for 1.1.3 (given
>>>>> that there is a test failure in #2580). I'm not too familiar with the
>>>>> Kafka connector though. @Tzu-Li, Stephan: Can you please comment on
>>>>> both of these whether they need to go in?
>>>>>
>>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to