Hi Pavel, I think it's a good point you're raising here. The Flink community isn't using metrics like test coverage to ensure high quality code yet. I think that is one thing which we can/should improve. Unfortunately, the ASF does not allow to use codecov.io (or at least the Apache Infra team) [1]. However, they encourage to use coveralls.io.
Do you know this tool and want to take a look how it could be integrated with the Flink repository? It seems as if it is free for open source projects. Maybe you can create a JIRA issue for this integration and then take the lead there. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11273 Cheers, Till On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > the Cobertura plugin was removed in this PR: > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/454 > Not sure if it was accidentally removed or on purpose. > It was not included in the regular builds to reduce build time and AFAIK, > it wasn't manually used either (otherwise somebody would have noticed that > it is gone). > > I am not aware of any code coverage stats for the Flink code base but it > would be nice to some, IMO. > > Best, Fabian > > 2016-08-19 0:36 GMT+02:00 Pavel Fadeev <pavel.fad...@gmail.com>: > > > Dear team, > > > > I`m just looking around into the project - complete novice at Flink :) > > Sorry if Qs below already have answers! > > > > At first glance I`ve discovered that code coverage feature has been > > introduced with FLINK-305 <https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/FLINK-305 > > > > > and then removed for some reason on March 2015. > > > > Are you aware if it is not required anymore? Worried a bit about this > after > > local coverage run for flink-code as well. Do we have some integration > like > > codecov <https://codecov.io> here and do you feel if it is required? > > > > Also, do you know if there are some statistics (or team knowledge) for > > regression bugs from uncovered code? > > >
