That's good news. :-) Thanks for looking into it Till and Stephan.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > I talked to Stephan and he pointed out that the flink-dist binary file, > which is Flink's fat jar, is not part of the official Flink release. We do > offer to download this file as part of a zip file from the Flink website. > However, this is only for convenience. In contrast to that, other binary > files, such as the jars which are released on maven-central, are part of > the official release. Consequently, these files must contain appropriate > LICENSE and NOTICE files. If I remember correctly, then this is relevant > for modules which shade dependencies away, because the shaded dependency is > then contained in the jar. > > That was also the reason why we removed the license entries for all the > dependencies contained in flink-dist. Given that this reasoning is sound, > we can keep the LICENSE and NOTICE file as it is modulo the changes we > introduced between Flink 1.0 and 1.1. > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > Hmm, this sounds like we should also have a proper LICENSE/NOTICE for our >> > binary releases. >> >> True... to quote the linked ASF page: "As far as LICENSE and NOTICE >> are concerned, only bundled bits matter." >>
