Just started the vote but let's include it. No biggie. I will re-run the
script later today.

On Thursday, 14 April 2016, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> a user (Hironori Ogibayashi) found another somewhat critical bug:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3760
>
> It's an easy fix and I will open a PR momentarily.
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 at 13:17 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your feedback Till and Aljoscha. I will trigger the first RC
> > today.
> >
> > – Ufuk
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > I also found an issue in the RocksDB backend (not introduced by me...
> > ;-):
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3730
> > >
> > > It's not that critical, however.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 18:40 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Given that it's low overhead, then +1 for new bug fix release. If we
> > find
> > >> more stuff later on, then we can release another bug fix version.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Till
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hey all,
> > >> >
> > >> > we recently released Flink 1.0.1, but some fixes did not make it
> into
> > >> > the release:
> > >> >
> > >> > Major issues reported by users:
> > >> > - YARN dynamic properties (to be merged to release-1.0),
> > >> > - POJO key selection,
> > >> > - WindowOperator.trigger() and watermarks
> > >> >
> > >> > Performance improvement:
> > >> > - Disable WAL in RocksDB
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Since creating a release is a low overhead async task, I thought
> about
> > >> > triggering the new RC soon.
> > >> >
> > >> > What do you think? Should we go for it or wait a little more?
> > >> >
> > >> > – Ufuk
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to