Hi Maximilian,
Thanks for the email and looking into the issue. I'm using Scala 2.11 so it
sounds perfect to me...
I will be more than happy to test it out.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Deepak,
>
> We have looked further into this and have a pretty easy fix. However,
> it will only work with Flink's Scala 2.11 version because newer
> versions of the Akka library are incompatible with Scala 2.10 (Flink's
> default Scala version). Would that be a viable option for you?
>
> We're currently discussing this here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821
>
> Best,
> Max
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Deepak Jha <dkjhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Maximilian,
> > Thanks for your response. I will wait for the update.
> >
> > On Monday, March 14, 2016, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Deepak,
> >>
> >> We'll look more into this problem this week. Until now we considered it
> a
> >> configuration issue if the bind address was not externally reachable.
> >> However, one might not always have the possibility to change this
> network
> >> configuration.
> >>
> >> Looking further, it is actually possible to let the bind address be
> >> different from the advertised address. From the Akka FAQ at
> >> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/2.4.1/additional/faq.html:
> >>
> >> If you are running an ActorSystem under a NAT or inside a docker
> container,
> >> > make sure to set akka.remote.netty.tcp.hostname and
> >> > akka.remote.netty.tcp.port to the address it is reachable at from
> other
> >> > ActorSystems. If you need to bind your network interface to a
> different
> >> > address - use akka.remote.netty.tcp.bind-hostname and
> >> > akka.remote.netty.tcp.bind-port settings. Also make sure your network
> is
> >> > configured to translate from the address your ActorSystem is
> reachable at
> >> > to the address your ActorSystem network interface is bound to.
> >> >
> >>
> >> It looks like we have to expose this configuration to users who have a
> >> special network setup.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Max
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Deepak Jha <dkjhan...@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Stephan & Ufuk,
> >> > Thanks for your response.
> >> >
> >> > Yes there is a way in which you can run docker (net = host mode) in
> which
> >> > guest machine's network stack gets shared by docker container.
> >> > Unfortunately its not supported by AWS ECS.
> >> >
> >> > I do have one more question for you. Can you guys please explain me
> what
> >> > happens when taskmanager's register themselves to jobmanager in HA
> mode?
> >> > Does each taskmanager gets connected to jobmanager on separate port ?
> The
> >> > reason I'm asking is because if I run 2 taskmanager's (on separate
> docker
> >> > container), they are able to attach themselves to the Jobmanager
> (another
> >> > docker container) ( Flink HA setup using remote zk cluster) but soon
> >> after
> >> > that they get disconnected. Logs are not very helpful either... I
> suspect
> >> > that each taskmanager gets connected on new port and since by default
> >> > docker does not expose all ports, this may happen.... I do not see
> this
> >> > happen when I do not use docker container....
> >> >
> >> > Here is the log file that I saw in jobmanager....
> >> >
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:55:55,010 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Registered TaskManager at 5673db03e679 (akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager) as
> >> > 7eafcfddd6bd084f2ec5a32594603f4f. Current number of registered hosts
> >> > is 1. *Current
> >> > number of alive task slots is 1.*
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:57:42,676 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Registered TaskManager at 7200a7da4da7 (akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager) as
> >> > 320338e15a7a44ee64dc03a40f04fcd7. Current number of registered hosts
> >> > is 2. *Current
> >> > number of alive task slots is 2.*
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:57:48,422 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > o.a.f.runtime.jobmanager.JobManager - Task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager terminated.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:57:48,422 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager
> >> > -*
> >> > Unregistered task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager
> >> > <http://flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager>. Number of registered
> >> task
> >> > managers 1. Number of available slots 1.*
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:01,417 PST [WARN]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > a.remote.ReliableDeliverySupervisor - Association with remote system
> >> > [akka.tcp://flink@172.17.0.3:6121] has failed, address is now gated
> for
> >> > [5000] ms. Reason is: [Disassociated].
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:01,451 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > o.a.f.runtime.jobmanager.JobManager - Task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager wants to disconnect, because
> >> > TaskManager akka://flink/user/taskmanager is disassociating.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:01,451 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager - *Unregistered
> >> > task manager akka.tcp://flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager
> >> > <http://flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager>. Number of registered
> >> task
> >> > managers 0. Number of available slots 0.*
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:01,465 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager - *Registered
> >> > TaskManager at 7200a7da4da7
> >> > (akka.tcp://flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager
> >> > <http://flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager>) as
> >> > b5dbbc829854afa3ec5d8f0b6f9dbd03. Current number of registered hosts
> is
> >> 1.
> >> > Current number of alive task slots is 1.*
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:03,383 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > o.a.f.runtime.jobmanager.JobManager - Task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager terminated.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:03,384 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager
> >> > -*
> >> > Unregistered task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager
> >> > <http://flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager>. Number of registered
> >> task
> >> > managers 0. Number of available slots 0.*
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:04,988 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Registering TaskManager at akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager
> >> > which was marked as dead earlier because of a heart-beat timeout.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:04,988 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Registered TaskManager at 7200a7da4da7 (akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager) as
> >> > eac0ce12e6ec885863d3438d691f4ab2. Current number of registered hosts
> is
> >> 1.
> >> > Current number of alive task slots is 1.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:21,382 PST [WARN]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > a.remote.ReliableDeliverySupervisor - Association with remote system
> >> > [akka.tcp://flink@172.17.0.3:6121] has failed, address is now gated
> for
> >> > [5000] ms. Reason is: [Disassociated].
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:21,388 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> > o.a.f.runtime.jobmanager.JobManager - Task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager wants to disconnect, because
> >> > TaskManager akka://flink/user/taskmanager is disassociating.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:21,388 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Unregistered task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager.
> >> > Number of registered task managers 0. Number of available slots 0.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:21,390 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Registered TaskManager at 7200a7da4da7 (akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager) as
> >> > bda61dbd047d40889aa3868d5d4d86a9. Current number of registered hosts
> is
> >> 1.
> >> > Current number of alive task slots is 1.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:25,433 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-18]
> >> > o.a.f.runtime.jobmanager.JobManager - Task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager terminated.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:25,434 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-18]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Unregistered task manager akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager.
> >> > Number of registered task managers 0. Number of available slots 0.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:28,947 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Registering TaskManager at akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager
> >> > which was marked as dead earlier because of a heart-beat timeout.
> >> > 2016-03-12 08:58:28,948 PST [INFO]  ec2-54-173-231-120.compute-1.a
> >> > [flink-akka.actor.default-dispatcher-20]
> >> o.a.f.r.instance.InstanceManager -
> >> > Registered TaskManager at 7200a7da4da7 (akka.tcp://
> >> > flink@172.17.0.3:6121/user/taskmanager) as
> >> > d42ea5c6e0053935a0973d8536f3d8a5. Current number of registered hosts
> is
> >> 1.
> >> > Current number of alive task slots is 1.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org
> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Deepak!
> >> > >
> >> > > We can currently not split the bind address and advertised address,
> >> > because
> >> > > the Akka library only accepts packages sent explicitly to the bind
> >> > address
> >> > > (not sure why Akka has this artificial limitation, but it is there).
> >> > >
> >> > > Can you bridge the container IP address to be visible from the
> outside?
> >> > >
> >> > > Stephan
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org
> >> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hey Deepak!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Your description of Flink's behaviour is correct. To summarize:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > # Host Address
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you specify a host address as an argument to the JVM (via
> >> > > > jobmanager.sh or the start-cluster.sh scripts) then that one is
> used.
> >> > > > If you don't, it falls back to the value configured in
> >> flink-conf.yaml
> >> > > > (what you describe).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > # Ports
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Default used random port and publishes via ZooKeeper. You can
> >> > > > configure a port range only via recovery.jobmanager.port (what you
> >> > > > describe).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Your proposal would likely solve the issue, but isn't it possible
> to
> >> > > > handle this outside of Flink? I've found this stack overflow
> >> question,
> >> > > > which should be related:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26539727/giving-a-docker-container-a-routable-ip-address
> >> > > >
> >> > > > What's your opinion?
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Deepak Jha
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from Gmail Mobile
>



-- 
Thanks,
Deepak Jha

Reply via email to