I'll switch back to Scala 2.10 and try again, I was sure I ran the script
before running the build; maybe something went wrong and I didn't notice.

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:

> Are the docs actually wrong?
>
> In the docs, it says to run the "tools/change-scala-version.sh 2.11" script
> first (which implicitly adds the "-Dscala-2.11" flag.
>
> I thought this problem arose because neither the flag was specified, nor
> the script run.
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > @Stefano: Yes, would be great to have a fix in the docs and pointers
> > on how to improve the docs for this.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Stefano Baghino
> > <stefano.bagh...@radicalbit.io> wrote:
> > > Build successful, thank you.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Baghino <
> > > stefano.bagh...@radicalbit.io> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'll try it immediately, thanks for the quick feedback and sorry for
> the
> > >> intrusion. Should I add this to the docs? The flag seem to be
> > >> -Dscala.version=2.11.x on them:
> > >>
> >
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/setup/building.html#scala-versions
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Sorry, the flag is "-Dscala-2.11"
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi!
> > >>> >
> > >>> > To compile with Scala 2.11, please use the "-Dscala.version=2.11"
> > flag.
> > >>> > Otherwise the 2.11 specific build profiles will not get properly
> > >>> activated.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Can you try that again?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks,
> > >>> > Stephan
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stefano Baghino <
> > >>> > stefano.bagh...@radicalbit.io> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> I won't cast a vote as I'm not entirely sure this is just a local
> > >>> problem
> > >>> >> (and from the document the Scala 2.11 build has been checked),
> > however
> > >>> >> I've
> > >>> >> checked out the `release-1.0-rc5` branch and ran `mvn clean
> install
> > >>> >> -DskipTests -Dscala.version=2.11.7`, with a failure on
> > `flink-runtime`:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> [ERROR]
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> /Users/Stefano/Projects/flink/flink-runtime/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManagerITCase.scala:703:
> > >>> >> error: can't expand macros compiled by previous versions of Scala
> > >>> >> [ERROR]               assert(cachedGraph2.isArchived)
> > >>> >> [ERROR]                                   ^
> > >>> >> [ERROR] one error found
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Is the 2.11 build still compiling successfully according to your
> > latest
> > >>> >> tests?
> > >>> >> I've tried running a clean and re-running without skipping the
> tests
> > >>> but
> > >>> >> the issue persists.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> > +1
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >> > Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files
> > >>> >> > Built against Hadoop 2.6, Scala 2.10, all tests are good
> > >>> >> > Run local pseudo cluster with examples
> > >>> >> > Log files look good, no exceptions
> > >>> >> > Tested File State Backend
> > >>> >> > Ran Storm Compatibility Examples
> > >>> >> >    -> minor issue, one example fails (no release blocker in my
> > >>> opinion)
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <
> > trohrm...@apache.org>
> > >>> >> > wrote:
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >> > > +1
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >> > > Checked that the sources don't contain binaries
> > >>> >> > > Tested cluster execution with flink/run and web client job
> > >>> submission
> > >>> >> > > Run all examples via FliRTT
> > >>> >> > > Tested Kafka 0.9
> > >>> >> > > Verified that quickstarts work with Eclipse and IntelliJ
> > >>> >> > > Run example with RemoteEnvironment
> > >>> >> > > Verified SBT quickstarts
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <
> > >>> aljos...@apache.org
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >> > > wrote:
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >> > > > +1
> > >>> >> > > >
> > >>> >> > > > I think we have a winner. :D
> > >>> >> > > >
> > >>> >> > > > The “boring” tests from the checklist should still hold for
> > this
> > >>> RC
> > >>> >> > and I
> > >>> >> > > > now ran a custom windowing job with state on RocksDB on
> Hadoop
> > >>> 2.7
> > >>> >> with
> > >>> >> > > > Scala 2.11. I used the Yarn HA mode and shot down both
> > >>> JobManagers
> > >>> >> and
> > >>> >> > > > TaskManagers and the job restarted successfully. I also
> > verified
> > >>> >> that
> > >>> >> > > > savepoints work in this setup.
> > >>> >> > > >
> > >>> >> > > > > On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:08, Robert Metzger <
> > rmetz...@apache.org>
> > >>> >> > wrote:
> > >>> >> > > > >
> > >>> >> > > > > Apparently I was not careful enough when writing the
> email.
> > >>> >> > > > > The release branch is "release-1.0.0-rc5" and its the
> fifth
> > RC.
> > >>> >> > > > >
> > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Robert Metzger <
> > >>> >> rmetz...@apache.org>
> > >>> >> > > > wrote:
> > >>> >> > > > >
> > >>> >> > > > >> Dear Flink community,
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache
> > >>> Flink
> > >>> >> > > version
> > >>> >> > > > >> 1.0.0.
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> This is the fourth RC.
> > >>> >> > > > >> Here is a document to report on the testing and release
> > >>> >> > verification:
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > >
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoQ5k4WQteNj2OoPwpQPD4ZVHrCwM1pTlUVww8ld7oY/edit#heading=h.2v6zy51pgj33
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on (*
> > >>> >> > > >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a
> > >>> >> > > > >> <
> > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/94cd554a
> > >>> >*)
> > >>> >> > > > >> 94cd554aee39413588bd30890dc7aed886b1c91d
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> Branch:
> > >>> >> > > > >> release-1.0.0-rc4 (see
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > >
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc5
> > >>> >> > > > >> )
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > >>> >> > > > >> *http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/
> > >>> >> > > > >> <http://home.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc5/>*
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with
> > fingerprint
> > >>> >> > > D9839159:
> > >>> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > >>> >> > > > >> *
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069
> > >>> >> > > > >> <
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1069
> > >>> >> > > > >*
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> The vote is open until Friday and passes if a majority of
> > at
> > >>> >> least
> > >>> >> > > three
> > >>> >> > > > >> +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> The vote ends on Friday, March 4, 19:00 CET.
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0
> > >>> >> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> Changes since RC4:
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> commit a79521fba60407ff5a800ec78fcfeee750d826d6
> > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> > >>> >> > > > >> Date:   Thu Mar 3 09:32:40 2016 +0100
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>    [hotfix] Make 'force-shading' deployable
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> commit 3adc51487aaae97469fc05e511be85d0a75a21d3
> > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
> > >>> >> > > > >> Date:   Wed Mar 2 17:52:05 2016 +0100
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>    [maven] add module to force execution of Shade plugin
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>    This ensures that all properties of the root pom are
> > >>> properly
> > >>> >> > > > >>    resolved by running the Shade plugin. Thus, our root
> pom
> > >>> does
> > >>> >> not
> > >>> >> > > > have
> > >>> >> > > > >>    to depend on a Scala version just because it holds the
> > >>> Scala
> > >>> >> > > version
> > >>> >> > > > >>    properties.
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> commit b862fd0b3657d8b9026a54782bad5a1fb71c19f4
> > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org>
> > >>> >> > > > >> Date:   Sun Feb 21 23:01:00 2016 +0100
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>    [FLINK-3422][streaming] Update tests reliant on
> hashing
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >> commit a049d80e8aef7f0d23fbc06d263fb3e7a0f2f05f
> > >>> >> > > > >> Author: Gabor Horvath <xazax....@gmail.com>
> > >>> >> > > > >> Date:   Sun Feb 21 14:54:44 2016 +0100
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>    [FLINK-3422][streaming][api-breaking] Scramble
> > >>> HashPartitioner
> > >>> >> > > > hashes.
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > > >>
> > >>> >> > > >
> > >>> >> > > >
> > >>> >> > >
> > >>> >> >
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> --
> > >>> >> BR,
> > >>> >> Stefano Baghino
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> BR,
> > >> Stefano Baghino
> > >>
> > >> Software Engineer @ Radicalbit
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > BR,
> > > Stefano Baghino
> > >
> > > Software Engineer @ Radicalbit
> >
>



-- 
BR,
Stefano Baghino

Software Engineer @ Radicalbit

Reply via email to