Anyone?

Otherwise, I will suggest to move forward with the PR using the
assumption that Redis must be started manually.

-Matthias

On 02/11/2016 08:28 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In Flink it is possible to have different backends for operator state. I
> am wondering what the best approach for different state backends would be.
> 
> Let's assume the backend is a database server. The following questions
> arise:
>   - Should the database server be started manually by the user or can
> Flink start the server automatically it used?
>     (this seems to be the approach for RocksDB as embedded servers)
>   - Should each job use the same or individual backup server (or maybe a
> mix of both?)
> 
> I personally think, that Flink should not start-up a backup server but
> assume that it is available when the job is submitted. This allows the
> user also the start up multiple instances of the backup server and
> choose which one to use for each job individually.
> 
> What do you think about it? I ask because of the current PR for Redis as
> StateBackend:
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1617
> 
> There is no embedded mode for Redis as for RocksDB.
> 
> -Matthias
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to