Hi, I think the refactoring of Partitioned State and the WindowOperator on state work is almost ready. I also have the RocksDB state backend working. I’m running some tests now on the cluster and should be able to open a PR tomorrow.
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 15:36, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > I agree, with Gyula, one out-of-core state backend should be in. We are > pretty close to that. Aljoscha has done good work on extending test > coverage for state backends, so we should be pretty comfortable that it > works as well, once we integrate new state backends with the tests. > > There is a bit of work do do around extending the interface of the > key/value state. I would like to start a separate thread on that today or > tomorrow... > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I agree that getting Flink 1.0.0 out soon would be great as Flink is in a >> pretty solid state right now. >> >> I wonder whether it would make sense to include an out-of-core state >> backend in streaming core that can be used with partitioned/window states. >> I think if we are releasing 1.0.0 we should have a solid feature set for >> our strong steaming use-cases (in this case stateful, and windowed >> computations) and this should be a part of that. >> >> I know that Aljoscha is working on a solution for this which will probably >> involve a heavy refactor of the State backend interfaces, and I am also >> working on a similar solution. Maybe it would be good to get at least one >> good robust solution for this in and definitely Aljoscha's refactor for the >> interfaces. >> >> If we decide to do this, I think this needs 1-2 extra weeks of proper >> testing so this might delay the schedule a little bit. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Gyula >> >> >> >> Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2016. jan. 25., H, >> 11:54): >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to release 1.0.0 in the next weeks. >>> Looking at the JIRAs, I think we are going to close a lot of blocking >>> issues soon. How about we do a first release candidate on Wednesday, 3. >>> February? >>> >>> The first release candidate is most likely not going to pass the vote, >> the >>> primary goal will be collecting a list of issues we need to address. >>> >>> There is also a Wiki page for the 1.0 release: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/1.0+Release >>> >>> Please -1 to this message if 3. February is too soon for the first RC (it >>> also means that we'll do a feature freeze around that time). >>> >>
