Hi Nick, That was an oversight when the release was created. As Stephan mentioned, we have a policy that the corresponding final release branch is read-only. Creating the tag is just a formality but of course important. I've pushed a 'release-0.10.1' release tag. The corresponding hash is 2e9b231.
Cheers, Max On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > All build are built equal against Hadoop, but a specific Hadoop version is > still part of the Flink lib folder when downloaded. > > Cross Hadoop-version compatibility is not good, i.e., when Flink has Hadoop > 2.4 in the classpath, it does not work with a 2.6 YARN installation. That > is why we pre-build multiple versions. > > Best, > Stephan > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, a tag would be very good practice, IMHO. Those of us who need to run >> release + patches appreciate the release hygiene :) >> >> If all builds are created equal re: Hadoop versions, I recommend against >> publishing Hadoop-specific tarballs on the downloads page; it left me quite >> confused, as I'm sure it would other users. >> >> On Friday, January 8, 2016, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Hi Nick! >> > >> > We have not pushed a release tag, but have a frozen release-0.10.1-RC1 >> > branch (https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-0.10.1-rc1) >> > A tag would be great, agree! >> > >> > Flink does in its core not depend on Hadoop. The parts that reference >> > Hadoop (HDFS filesystem, YARN, MapReduce function/format compatibility) >> are >> > not using any Hadoop version specific code (with the exception of some >> YARN >> > functions, which are reflectively invoked). So it should work across >> > versions nicely. The main friction we saw were version clashes of >> > transitive dependencies. >> > >> > The Flink CI builds include building Flink with Hadoop 2.5.0, see here: >> > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/.travis.yml >> > >> > Greetings, >> > Stephan >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > > An only-slightly related question: Is Flink using Hadoop version >> specific >> > > features in some way? IIRC, the basic APIs should be compatible back as >> > far >> > > as 2.2. I'm surprised to see builds of flink explicitly against many >> > hadoop >> > > versions, but 2.5.x is excluded. >> > > >> > > -n >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Devs, >> > > > >> > > > It seems no release tag was pushed to 0.10.1. I presume this was an >> > > > oversight. Is there some place I can look to see from which sha the >> > > 0.10.1 >> > > > release was built? Are the RC vote threads the only cannon in this >> > > matter? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Nick >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
