Wow! Thanks Fabian, this looks fantastic!

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:

> Super, thanks for that detailed effort, Fabian!
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Pretty cool!
> >
> > On 01/07/2016 03:05 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > in the last days, Timo and I refined the design document for adding a
> > SQL /
> > > StreamSQL interface on top of Flink that was started by Stephan.
> > >
> > > The document proposes an architecture that is centered around Apache
> > > Calcite. Calcite is an Apache top-level project and includes a SQL
> > parser,
> > > a semantic validator for relational queries, and a rule- and cost-based
> > > relational optimizer. Calcite is used by Apache Hive and Apache Drill
> > > (among other projects). In a nutshell, the plan is to translate Table
> API
> > > and SQL queries into Calcite's relational expression trees, optimize
> > these
> > > trees, and translate them into DataSet and DataStream programs.The
> > document
> > > breaks down the work into several tasks and subtasks.
> > >
> > > Please review the design document and comment.
> > >
> > > -- >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TLayJNOTBle_-m1rQfgA6Ouj1oYsfqRjPcp1h2TVqdI/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> > > Unless there are major concerns with the design, Timo and I want to
> start
> > > next week to move the current Table API on top of Apache Calcite (Task
> 1
> > in
> > > the document). The goal of this task is to have the same functionality
> as
> > > currently, but with Calcite in the translation process. This is a
> > blocking
> > > task that we hope to complete soon. Afterwards, we can independently
> work
> > > on different aspects such as extending the Table API, adding a SQL
> > > interface (basically just a parser), integration with external data
> > > sources, better code generation, optimization rules, streaming support
> > for
> > > the Table API, StreamSQL, etc..
> > >
> > > Timo and I plan to work on a WIP branch to implement Task 1 and merge
> it
> > to
> > > the master branch once the task is completed. Of course, everybody is
> > > welcome to contribute to this effort. Please let us know such that we
> can
> > > coordinate our efforts.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Fabian
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to