Disabling the access for secure installation: Pretty easy. Writing it right now.
@mxm: Thanks. I haven't implemented any handlers for actually running the job. I hope to finish it by this weekend. One quick question: The runtime monitor will be running the job itself, i.e., the main method of program's entry class. Will that be a major issue, that one thread is performing this work [although the server is capable to handling several requests in parallel]? -- Sachin Goel Computer Science, IIT Delhi m. +91-9871457685 On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > @Robert: I'm in favor of having a submission page which can be deactivated. > My point was simply that we don't have proper security support right now. I > agree with Stephan that we'll need to support it! > > @Stephan: Good suggestion to disable the submission page for the per-job > YARN cluster. > > @Sachin: Looks nice. Probably there should also be an option to view the > plan like in the web client. Should not be so hard since we already have > the visualization in place on other pages. > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Ah. Sharing the links then: > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Xlv1qTgpjDT0ZCd0pSU3VYMUU/view?usp=sharing > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Xlv1qTgpjDeG51azRRc0FJYjQ/view?usp=sharing > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0Xlv1qTgpjDSHZXQ0h5S0FBS3c/view?usp=sharing > > > > -- Sachin Goel > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > m. +91-9871457685 > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey Sachin, I think you can not upload images to apache mailing lists. > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Okay. I think that does it. I've already designed the basic > interface, > > > > although the major part for uploading jars and actually running the > job > > > are > > > > left. :') > > > > Here are some screenshots: > > > > [image: Inline image 2][image: Inline image 1][image: Inline image 3] > > > > > > > > -- Sachin Goel > > > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > > > m. +91-9871457685 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 The web client needs to go. > > > >> > > > >> I don't really see how how a submission page on the job manager > would > > > make > > > >> security worse. At the moment, anyone who sends an Akka message to > the > > > job > > > >> manager, can execute arbitrary code.. > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Flavio Pompermaier < > > > pomperma...@okkam.it > > > >> > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > +1 to remove the old web client in favor of an improved dashboard > > (not > > > >> so > > > >> > urgent however) > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Robert Metzger < > > rmetz...@apache.org> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, > > > >> > > I personally like the idea of allowing users to submit a job > from > > > the > > > >> web > > > >> > > interface a lot. In particular for users new to the system, its > a > > > very > > > >> > > convenient feature. > > > >> > > We would also get rid of this ugly, old web client :) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Regarding security: We can always add a configuration parameter > > > which > > > >> > > allows users to disable the feature. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Please share the screenshot with us :) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Sachin Goel < > > > >> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The current authentication mechanism is via htaccess, in the > > > >> webclient. > > > >> > > The > > > >> > > > dashboard however isn't secured at all. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- Sachin Goel > > > >> > > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > > >> > > > m. +91-9871457685 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > > >> aljos...@apache.org> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > The reason why we didn’t want to have it in the JobManager > > > >> interface > > > >> > by > > > >> > > > > default is that it could be a security concern. I also see, > > > >> however, > > > >> > > that > > > >> > > > > security in general is not very strong right now. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 05 Nov 2015, at 09:58, Matthias J. Sax < > mj...@apache.org > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I like the idea in general! Not sure if integrating it > into > > > >> > > JobMangaer > > > >> > > > > > Webinterface is good or not... What would be the pros/cons > > for > > > >> > > > > > standalone vs. integrated? > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -Matthias > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 11/05/2015 05:23 AM, Sachin Goel wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> Hi all > > > >> > > > > >> Are there any plans to upgrade the webclient interface? > It > > > >> could > > > >> > > > > certainly > > > >> > > > > >> use an upgrade compared to the much better dashboard . > > > >> > > > > >> If so, is integrating them into one the best way to go? > We > > > can > > > >> > have > > > >> > > a > > > >> > > > > tab > > > >> > > > > >> under Job Manager on the dashboard. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> I can share screenshots of the UI I designed last night, > if > > > >> it's > > > >> > > not a > > > >> > > > > >> terrible idea to do this. :') > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> Cheers! > > > >> > > > > >> Sachin > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
