Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is faulty for
interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most basic starting
point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n <>
examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way.


-- Sachin Goel
Computer Science, IIT Delhi
m. +91-9871457685

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to that, Stephan.
>
> I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800.
>
>
> From: Stephan Ewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)
>
>
> From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found another blocker
> bug, so this RC will need a few patches.
>
> I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would actually be the
> desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a release blocker.
>
> I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if possible, but not block
> the release on that. They seem to be very corner case. Good to fix them,
> but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 SNAPSHOT right now and
> too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be available in a release.
>
> How about we start testing anyways, because I would expect us to find more
> issues, and we save time if we do not create a new release candidate for
> each patch.
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800 could be worth of
> > further investigations before this release
> >
> > Best,
> > Flavio
> > On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" <gyf...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge :)
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I have to say -1
> > >
> > > FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point of view.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gyula
> > >
> > > Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2015.
> > okt.
> > > 21., Sze, 20:07):
> > >
> > > > Awesome! Thanks Max :))
> > > >
> > > > I have a couple of questions:
> > > > - what about the blocker issue (according to the wiki) FLINK-2747?
> > > > - weren't we going to get rid of staging altogether?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > -V.
> > > >
> > > > On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Super, thanks Max!
> > > > >
> > > > > We should also bump the master to the next version then, to
> separate
> > > what
> > > > > goes into release fixes and what goes into the next version...
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a separate thread, I
> > > > guess...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> m...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Release candidates have to be tested thoroughly. Therefore, I
> would
> > > > like
> > > > > > everybody to take a look at the release page in the wiki:
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've compiled the checks into a document. I would like everyone
> to
> > > > assign
> > > > > > one of the checks in the documents to test the release candidate:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> > m...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dear community,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The past months we have been working very hard to push towards
> > > 0.10.
> > > > I
> > > > > > > would like to propose the first release candidate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ===================================
> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Flink
> > > > > version
> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
> > > > > > > b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Branch:
> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc0 (see
> > > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > > C2909CBF:
> > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047
> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority
> > of
> > > at
> > > > > > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ===================================
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to