I added two comments to the pull request that this is based on...

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:

> I suspect: "- Deletion of "DataSet.forward() and .global()"" is a typo, you
> meant DataStream ?
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Oh, and of course, support for event time. I might be forgetting more,
> feel
> > free to add to the list
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Currently, Aljoscha, Stephan, and I are reworking the DataStream API as
> > > discussed before. Things are a bit in-flight right now with several
> > commits
> > > and pull requests, and the current master containing code from both the
> > old
> > > and the new API.
> > >
> > > I want to give you an idea of how the new API will look like. This is a
> > > very rough draft of the new documentation page (also a WiP):
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/t5nvlx7meadppnp/AAD5sEIH5S3QNYTiMsyE9KBva?dl=0
> > >
> > > Compared to the current API, the major changes include:
> > >
> > > - Different syntax (and implementation) for windows. Old constructs
> will
> > > be replaced by the new ones. The new syntax resembles Google's Dataflow
> > > model, but contains "shortcuts" as syntactic sugar for common cases
> > >
> > > - Different syntax (and implementation) of "grouping". New terminology
> > > will be KeyedDataStream (and "keyBy") which will replace
> > GroupedDataStream.
> > >
> > > - Reduced functionality in ConnectedDataStream - only map and flatMap
> > >
> > > - New syntax (and implementation) for window joins, removal of cross
> > >
> > > - No changes in iterations besides deleting the "long milliseconds"
> > > argument
> > >
> > > - No changes in state
> > >
> > > - Deletion of "DataSet.forward() and .global()"
> > >
> > > - Windows can only come after keyBy, otherwise they are DOP-1 operators
> > > and are defined as "windowAll"
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kostas
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to