Yes, you're right. BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest has actually finished :-) Sorry for the confusion! I'll wait for your fix then, thanks!
On 21 September 2015 at 22:51, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > I am actually very happy that it is not the > "BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest", that would be hell to debug... > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Ah, actually it is a different test. I think you got confused by the > > sysout log, because multiple parallel tests print there (that makes it > not > > always obvious which one hangs). > > > > The test is the "SocketClientSinkTest.testSocketSinkRetryAccess()" test. > > You can see that by looking in which test case the "main" thread is > stuck, > > > > This test is very unstable, but, fortunately, I made a fix 1h ago and it > > is being tested on Travis right now :-) > > > > Cheers, > > Stephan > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > > vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Locally yes. > >> > >> Here's the stack trace: > >> > >> > >> 2015-09-21 22:22:46 > >> Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.75-b04 mixed > mode): > >> > >> "Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d104e800 nid=0x4013 > waiting > >> on condition [0x0000000000000000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > >> > >> "Service Thread" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d3807000 nid=0x4c03 > runnable > >> [0x0000000000000000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > >> > >> "C2 CompilerThread1" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d2001000 nid=0x4a03 > >> waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > >> > >> "C2 CompilerThread0" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d201e000 nid=0x4803 > >> waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > >> > >> "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d3012800 nid=0x451b > >> runnable [0x0000000000000000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > >> > >> "Finalizer" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4005800 nid=0x3303 in > >> Object.wait() [0x000000011430d000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) > >> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > >> - waiting on <0x00000007ef504858> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) > >> at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:135) > >> - locked <0x00000007ef504858> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) > >> at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:151) > >> at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:209) > >> > >> "Reference Handler" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d480b000 nid=0x3103 in > >> Object.wait() [0x000000011420a000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) > >> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > >> - waiting on <0x00000007ef504470> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) > >> at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503) > >> at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) > >> - locked <0x00000007ef504470> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) > >> > >> "main" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4800000 nid=0xd03 runnable > >> [0x000000010b764000] > >> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > >> at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) > >> at > >> > java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.accept(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:398) > >> at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:530) > >> at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:498) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.SocketClientSinkTest.testSocketSinkRetryAccess(SocketClientSinkTest.java:315) > >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > >> at > >> > >> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) > >> at > >> > >> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) > >> at > >> > >> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47) > >> at > >> > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) > >> at > >> > >> > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44) > >> at > >> > >> > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) > >> at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) > >> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) > >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271) > >> at > >> > >> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70) > >> at > >> > >> > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) > >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238) > >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63) > >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236) > >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53) > >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229) > >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203) > >> at > >> > >> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155) > >> at > >> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103) > >> > >> "VM Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4005000 nid=0x2f03 runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d2005800 nid=0x1f03 > >> runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1800000 nid=0x2103 > >> runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1804800 nid=0x2303 > >> runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1805000 nid=0x2503 > >> runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1805800 nid=0x2703 > >> runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1806800 nid=0x2903 > >> runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1807000 nid=0x2b03 > >> runnable > >> > >> "GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1807800 nid=0x2d03 > >> runnable > >> > >> "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1006000 nid=0x4e03 > waiting > >> on condition > >> > >> JNI global references: 193 > >> > >> > >> On 21 September 2015 at 22:13, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > This happened locally on your machine? > >> > > >> > Can you dump the stack-trace and post it? "jps <processid> > > >> > stacktrace.txt" or so... > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > >> > vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi squirrels, > >> > > > >> > > I've been meaning to merge a PR (#1520), but my local maven build > gets > >> > > stuck at > >> > > > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest. > >> > > It looks like a deadlock.. The build just hangs there and top shows > no > >> > > CPU/memory load. Anyone else has experienced the same? I'm on OS X > >> 10.10. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks! > >> > > -Vasia. > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
