Hi Matthias, I'm totally with you on this issue. However, enforcing a strict version is not a trivial thing. For some people, it might be difficult to install a specific Jekyll version because of the dependencies on libraries and Ruby versions that come with it.
> On my system, version 2.2.0 is installed. On my system, Jekyll v2.5.3 is installed :) For now, I think the best solution is to only "git-add -p" the files that you have really touched when you rebuild the documentation. Cheers, Max On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I just observed when building the Flink web page locally, that a lot of > files got touched. Even files, that are not related to the actual > change. After asking, it turned out that the problem is different > versions of Jekyll that are used. > > I personally think that this is quite annoying and would suggest to > agree on a unique version to be used. What do you think about it? > > On my system, version 2.2.0 is installed. Maybe we should use the > version that the majority of people are using right now (to keep the > overhead of changing the version to a minimum). Or is anyone aware of a > technical reason for using (or avoiding) a specific version? > > > -Matthias >
